UNLABELLED: In this study, the feasibility of 3'-(18)F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine PET ((18)F-FLT PET) for staging patients with clinical stage III melanoma was investigated. METHODS: Ten patients with melanoma and metastases to the locoregional draining lymph nodes, clinical stage III-based on physical examination, chest radiography, lactate dehydrogenase, and histopathologic confirmation-underwent a whole-body (18)F-FLT PET scan 1 h after injection of a median 400-MBq dose (range, 185-430 MBq) of (18)F-FLT. All (18)F-FLT PET lesions were verified using the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, which includes physical examination, spiral CT, ultrasound, chest radiography, and histopathologic examinations. Size and mitotic rate of metastatic lymph nodes and skin metastases were determined. RESULTS: All histopathologic samples and (18)F-FLT PET lesions were categorized over anatomic regions and correlated. All locoregional metastases were correctly visualized by (18)F-FLT PET. Region-based sensitivity for detection of lymph node metastatic disease was 88%. There were 3 true-negative and 2 false-positive lesions. The detection limit for lymph node metastases appeared to be approximately 6 mm or a mitotic rate of 9 mitoses per 2 mm(2). Two patients were upstaged by (18)F-FLT PET, which was confirmed by CT. In 3 patients, (18)F-FLT PET detected a total of 3 additional lesions with therapeutic consequences, without influencing staging. These lesions were initially missed by clinical staging. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FLT PET seems promising for (re)staging purposes in clinical stage III melanoma. Further research is needed, in which (18)F-FLT PET should be compared with (18)F-FDG PET.
UNLABELLED: In this study, the feasibility of 3'-(18)F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine PET ((18)F-FLT PET) for staging patients with clinical stage III melanoma was investigated. METHODS: Ten patients with melanoma and metastases to the locoregional draining lymph nodes, clinical stage III-based on physical examination, chest radiography, lactate dehydrogenase, and histopathologic confirmation-underwent a whole-body (18)F-FLT PET scan 1 h after injection of a median 400-MBq dose (range, 185-430 MBq) of (18)F-FLT. All (18)F-FLT PET lesions were verified using the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System, which includes physical examination, spiral CT, ultrasound, chest radiography, and histopathologic examinations. Size and mitotic rate of metastatic lymph nodes and skin metastases were determined. RESULTS: All histopathologic samples and (18)F-FLT PET lesions were categorized over anatomic regions and correlated. All locoregional metastases were correctly visualized by (18)F-FLT PET. Region-based sensitivity for detection of lymph node metastatic disease was 88%. There were 3 true-negative and 2 false-positive lesions. The detection limit for lymph node metastases appeared to be approximately 6 mm or a mitotic rate of 9 mitoses per 2 mm(2). Two patients were upstaged by (18)F-FLT PET, which was confirmed by CT. In 3 patients, (18)F-FLT PET detected a total of 3 additional lesions with therapeutic consequences, without influencing staging. These lesions were initially missed by clinical staging. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FLT PET seems promising for (re)staging purposes in clinical stage III melanoma. Further research is needed, in which (18)F-FLT PET should be compared with (18)F-FDG PET.
Authors: Lukas B Been; Albert J H Suurmeijer; David C P Cobben; Pieter L Jager; Harald J Hoekstra; Philip H Elsinga Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Andreas K Buck; Martin Hetzel; Holger Schirrmeister; Gisela Halter; Peter Möller; Clemens Kratochwil; Andreas Wahl; Gerhard Glatting; Felix M Mottaghy; Torsten Mattfeldt; Bernd Neumaier; Sven N Reske Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-12-14 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Charles M Laymon; Matthew J Oborski; Vincent K Lee; Denise K Davis; Erik C Wiener; Frank S Lieberman; Fernando E Boada; James M Mountz Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Yuka Yamamoto; Terence Z Wong; Timothy G Turkington; Thomas C Hawk; David A Reardon; R Edward Coleman Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Lihui Wei; Yubin Miao; Fabio Gallazzi; Thomas P Quinn; Michael J Welch; Amy L Vāvere; Jason S Lewis Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Gang Ren; Zhe Liu; Zheng Miao; Hongguang Liu; Murugesan Subbarayan; Frederick T Chin; Lan Zhang; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Zhen Cheng Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 10.057