Literature DB >> 19186405

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations.

Anwar R Padhani1, Guoying Liu, Dow Mu Koh, Thomas L Chenevert, Harriet C Thoeny, Taro Takahara, Andrew Dzik-Jurasz, Brian D Ross, Marc Van Cauteren, David Collins, Dima A Hammoud, Gordon J S Rustin, Bachir Taouli, Peter L Choyke.   

Abstract

On May 3, 2008, a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored open consensus conference was held in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, during the 2008 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Meeting. Approximately 100 experts and stakeholders summarized the current understanding of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and reached consensus on the use of DW-MRI as a cancer imaging biomarker. DW-MRI should be tested as an imaging biomarker in the context of well-defined clinical trials, by adding DW-MRI to existing NCI-sponsored trials, particularly those with tissue sampling or survival indicators. Where possible, DW-MRI measurements should be compared with histologic indices including cellularity and tissue response. There is a need for tissue equivalent diffusivity phantoms; meanwhile, simple fluid-filled phantoms should be used. Monoexponential assessments of apparent diffusion coefficient values should use two b values (>100 and between 500 and 1000 mm2/sec depending on the application). Free breathing with multiple acquisitions is superior to complex gating techniques. Baseline patient reproducibility studies should be part of study designs. Both region of interest and histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements should be obtained. Standards for measurement, analysis, and display are needed. Annotated data from validation studies (along with outcome measures) should be made publicly available. Magnetic resonance imaging vendors should be engaged in this process. The NCI should establish a task force of experts (physicists, radiologists, and oncologists) to plan, organize technical aspects, and conduct pilot trials. The American College of Radiology Imaging Network infrastructure may be suitable for these purposes. There is an extraordinary opportunity for DW-MRI to evolve into a clinically valuable imaging tool, potentially important for drug development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19186405      PMCID: PMC2631136          DOI: 10.1593/neo.81328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasia        ISSN: 1476-5586            Impact factor:   5.715


  83 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with single-shot echo-planar imaging in the upper abdomen: preliminary clinical experience in 61 patients.

Authors:  T Ichikawa; H Haradome; J Hachiya; T Nitatori; T Araki
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

2.  Quality control for functional magnetic resonance imaging using automated data analysis and Shewhart charting.

Authors:  A Simmons; E Moore; S C Williams
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Multi-component apparent diffusion coefficients in human brain.

Authors:  R V Mulkern; H Gudbjartsson; C F Westin; H P Zengingonul; W Gartner; C R Guttmann; R L Robertson; W Kyriakos; R Schwartz; D Holtzman; F A Jolesz; S E Maier
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas.

Authors:  T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  A phantom for diffusion-weighted imaging of acute stroke.

Authors:  H J Laubach; P M Jakob; K O Loevblad; A E Baird; M P Bovo; R R Edelman; S Warach
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Characterization of and correction for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging.

Authors:  P Jezzard; A S Barnett; C Pierpaoli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  A model for diffusive transport through a spherical interface probed by pulsed-field gradient NMR.

Authors:  W S Price; A V Barzykin; K Hayamizu; M Tachiya
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging.

Authors:  I Yamada; W Aung; Y Himeno; T Nakagawa; H Shibuya
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions.

Authors:  T Ichikawa; H Haradome; J Hachiya; T Nitatori; T Araki
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Time course of lesion development in patients with acute stroke: serial diffusion- and hemodynamic-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  L H Schwamm; W J Koroshetz; A G Sorensen; B Wang; W A Copen; R Budzik; G Rordorf; F S Buonanno; P W Schaefer; R G Gonzalez
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  684 in total

1.  The interconnectedness of cancer cell signaling.

Authors:  Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Diffusion-prepared fast imaging with steady-state free precession (DP-FISP): a rapid diffusion MRI technique at 7 T.

Authors:  Lan Lu; Bernadette Erokwu; Gregory Lee; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold; Katherine M Dell; Chris A Flask
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Katherine M Mullen; Raymond Y Huang
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Investigation of the diffusion abnormality index as a new imaging biomarker for early assessment of brain tumor response to radiation therapy.

Authors:  Reza Farjam; Christina I Tsien; Felix Y Feng; Diana Gomez-Hassan; James A Hayman; Theodore S Lawrence; Yue Cao
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  [Oncological imaging for therapy response assessment].

Authors:  J Stattaus
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for staging of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a clinical feasibility study in comparison to CT and FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Katrijn Michielsen; Ignace Vergote; Katya Op de Beeck; Frederic Amant; Karin Leunen; Philippe Moerman; Christophe Deroose; Geert Souverijns; Steven Dymarkowski; Frederik De Keyzer; Vincent Vandecaveye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Effects of perfusion on diffusion changes in human brain tumors.

Authors:  Alexander D Cohen; Peter S LaViolette; Melissa Prah; Jennifer Connelly; Mark G Malkin; Scott D Rand; Wade M Mueller; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Functional and molecular MRI of the bone marrow in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Vassilis Koutoulidis; Nickolas Papanikolaou; Lia A Moulopoulos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Assessing reproducibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging studies in a murine model of HER2+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer G Whisenant; Gregory D Ayers; Mary E Loveless; Stephanie L Barnes; Daniel C Colvin; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.