Literature DB >> 17334794

The spinal cord dura mater reaction to nitinol and titanium alloy particles: a 1-year study in rabbits.

Souad Rhalmi1, Sylvie Charette, Michel Assad, Christine Coillard, Charles H Rivard.   

Abstract

This investigation was undertaken to simulate in an animal model the particles released from a porous nitinol interbody fusion device and to evaluate its consequences on the dura mater, spinal cord and nerve roots, lymph nodes (abdominal para-aortic), and organs (kidneys, spleen, pancreas, liver, and lungs). Our objective was to evaluate the compatibility of the nitinol particles with the dura mater in comparison with titanium alloy. In spite of the great use of metallic devices in spine surgery, the proximity of the spinal cord to the devices raised concerns about the effect of the metal debris that might be released onto the neural tissue. Forty-five New Zealand white female rabbits were divided into three groups: nitinol (treated: N = 4 per implantation period), titanium (treated: N = 4 per implantation period), and sham rabbits (control: N = 1 per observation period). The nitinol and titanium alloy particles were implanted in the spinal canal on the dura mater at the lumbar level L2-L3. The rabbits were sacrificed at 1, 4, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. Histologic sections from the regional lymph nodes, organs, from remote and implantation sites, were analyzed for any abnormalities and inflammation. Regardless of the implantation time, both nitinol and titanium particles remained at the implantation site and clung to the spinal cord lining soft tissue of the dura mater. The inflammation was limited to the epidural space around the particles and then reduced from acute to mild chronic during the follow-up. The dura mater, sub-dural space, nerve roots, and the spinal cord were free of reaction. No particles or abnormalities were found either in the lymph nodes or in the organs. In contact with the dura, the nitinol elicits an inflammatory response similar to that of titanium. The tolerance of nitinol by a sensitive tissue such as the dura mater during the span of 1 year of implantation demonstrated the safety of nitinol and its potential use as an intervertebral fusion device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17334794      PMCID: PMC2219660          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0329-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  30 in total

1.  Biocompatibility testing of NiTi screws using immunohistochemistry on sections containing metallic implants.

Authors:  M Berger-Gorbet; B Broxup; C Rivard; L H Yahia
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996-10

Review 2.  On the nature of the biocompatibility and on medical applications of NiTi shape memory and superelastic alloys.

Authors:  S A Shabalovskaya
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.300

3.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage.

Authors:  D S Brodke; J C Dick; D N Kunz; R McCabe; T A Zdeblick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts. A review of complications and techniques.

Authors:  L T Kurz; S R Garfin; R E Booth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A histologic study of soft-tissue reactions to spinal implants.

Authors:  D R Mody; S I Esses; M H Heggeness
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Interbody lumbar fusion using a carbon fiber cage implant versus allograft bone. An investigational study in the Spanish goat.

Authors:  J W Brantigan; P C McAfee; B W Cunningham; H Wang; C M Orbegoso
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Donor site pain from the ilium. A complication of lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  B N Summers; S M Eisenstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-08

8.  A new porous titanium-nickel alloy: part 2. Sensitization, irritation and acute systemic toxicity evaluation.

Authors:  Michel Assad; Alexandr Chernyshov; Michel A Leroux; Charles-H Rivard
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.300

9.  The effect of spinal instrumentation particulate wear debris. an in vivo rabbit model and applied clinical study of retrieved instrumentation cases.

Authors:  Bryan W Cunningham; Carlos M Orbegoso; Anton E Dmitriev; Nadim J Hallab; John C Sefter; Paul Asdourian; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation.

Authors:  J C Banwart; M A Asher; R S Hassanein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  13 in total

1.  Quantifying subtle but persistent peri-spine inflammation in vivo to submicron cobalt-chromium alloy particles.

Authors:  Nadim James Hallab; Frank W Chan; Megan L Harper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Covalent functionalization of NiTi surfaces with bioactive peptide amphiphile nanofibers.

Authors:  Timothy D Sargeant; Mukti S Rao; Chung-Yan Koh; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Porous NiTi for bone implants: a review.

Authors:  A Bansiddhi; T D Sargeant; S I Stupp; D C Dunand
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Assessment of epidural versus intradiscal biocompatibility of PEEK implant debris: an in vivo rabbit model.

Authors:  Nadim J Hallab; Qi-Bin Bao; Tim Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Histologic Comparison of the Dura Mater among Species.

Authors:  Ahmet Kinaci; Wilhelmina Bergmann; Ronald Law Bleys; Albert van der Zwan; Tristan Pc van Doormaal
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 6.  Spinal dura mater: biophysical characteristics relevant to medical device development.

Authors:  Sean J Nagel; Chandan G Reddy; Leonardo A Frizon; Matthieu K Chardon; Marshall Holland; Andre G Machado; George T Gillies; Matthew A Howard; Saul Wilson
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2018-03-23

7.  A review of the biologic effects of spine implant debris: Fact from fiction.

Authors:  Nadim James Hallab
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2009-12-01

8.  Factors Associated With Clinical Outcomes After Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Porous Nitinol Implant.

Authors:  Fahad H Abduljabbar; Asim M Makhdom; Mona Rajeh; Alisson R Tales; Jacob Mathew; Jean Ouellet; Michael Weber; Peter Jarzem
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07

Review 9.  Biomedical Porous Shape Memory Alloys for Hard-Tissue Replacement Materials.

Authors:  Bin Yuan; Min Zhu; Chi Yuen Chung
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Biomaterials in Spinal Implants: A Review.

Authors:  Andrew Warburton; Steven J Girdler; Christopher M Mikhail; Amy Ahn; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.