Literature DB >> 7939971

Interbody lumbar fusion using a carbon fiber cage implant versus allograft bone. An investigational study in the Spanish goat.

J W Brantigan1, P C McAfee, B W Cunningham, H Wang, C M Orbegoso.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A carbon fiber-reinforced polymer implant, designed to aid interbody lumbar fusion, was tested biologically in an experimental surgical model. Twenty-seven Spanish goats had interbody lumbar fusion surgery in a randomized protocol. Seventeen goats were implanted with the carbon fiber-reinforced polymer cage packed with autologous bone, and 10 goats were implanted with ethylene oxide-sterilized allograft bone.
OBJECTIVES: To determine fusion success, biocompatibility of the carbon polymer material, and possibility of carbon wear debris at intervals after surgical implantation.
METHODS: Goats were killed at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months and full-body autopsies were done. Spine specimens were studied by plain radiography, three-dimensional reformatted computed tomography studies, and histology.
RESULTS: At 6 months, one of three allograft implantations showed histologic and radiographic fusion, whereas five of five carbon fiber-reinforced polymer cage fusions showed at least partial fusion. At 12 months, two of three allograft implantations and five of five carbon fiber-reinforced polymer cage fusions were solidly fused. At 24 months, five of five allograft implantations and three of three carbon fiber-reinforced polymer cage implantations were solidly fused.
CONCLUSIONS: Interbody fusion using a carbon cage implant packed with autologous bone achieved a quicker and more reliable fusion compared with ethylene oxide-sterilized allograft bone. There were no adverse effects from the implant material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7939971     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199407000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  23 in total

Review 1.  [Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery].

Authors:  F Kandziora; K J Schnake; C K Klostermann; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Biodegradable cage. Osteointegration in spondylodesis of the sheep cervical spine].

Authors:  R Pflugmacher; T Eindorf; M Scholz; S Gumnior; C Krall; P Schleicher; N P Haas; F Kandziora
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Development of an in vivo method to investigate biomechanical and neurophysiological properties of spine facet joint capsules.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Chaoyang Chen; Srinivasu Kallakuri; Ajit Patwardhan; John M Cavanaugh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Primary stability of anterior lumbar stabilization: interdependence of implant type and endplate retention or removal.

Authors:  Christian H Flamme; Nadine von der Heide; Caroline Heymann; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of two interbody fusion cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a cadaveric model.

Authors:  Shih-Tien Wang; Vijay K Goel; Chong-Yau Fu; Shinichiro Kubo; Woosung Choi; Chien-Lin Liu; Tain-Hsiung Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: experimental results and comparison to known human data.

Authors:  H J Wilke; S T Krischak; K H Wenger; L E Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Tensile stretching of cervical facet joint capsule and related axonal changes.

Authors:  Srinivasu Kallakuri; Anita Singh; Ying Lu; Chaoyang Chen; Ajit Patwardhan; John M Cavanaugh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Bioresorbable polymers: heading for a new generation of spinal cages.

Authors:  P I J M Wuisman; T H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  [Interbody fusion procedures. Development from a historical perspective].

Authors:  Marcus Rickert; Michael Rauschmann; C Fleege; E Behrbalk; J Harms
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Allogenic versus autologous cancellous bone in lumbar segmental spondylodesis: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Patrick Strube; Julia F Funk; Christian Gross; Hans-Joachim Mönig; Carsten Perka; Axel Pruss
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.