Literature DB >> 17334766

Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases.

Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg1, Robert Rabenalt, Minh Do, Michael C Truss, Martin Burchardt, Thomas R Herrmann, Thilo Schwalenberg, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Evangelos N Liatsikos.   

Abstract

We herein review our experience with endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) as a first line therapy for localized prostate cancer. A series of 1,300 patients underwent EERPE ("wide excision", standard nervesparing technique (nsEERPE), or intrafascial nsEERPE). The mean age of the patients was 63.3 years. Preoperative PSA mean value was 10.1 ng/ml. A total of 415 patients had undergone previous surgical procedure in the lower abdomen (n = 336) and prior surgery of the prostate (n = 79), respectively. The EERPE was employed in all cases without any specific selection criteria. Mean operative time was 153 (50-320) min. including lymphadenectomy with no conversion to open surgery. Seven intraoperative, 91 early and 4 late complications occurred. The transfusion rate was 0.9%. Positive surgical margins were found in 83 patients with pT2 stage (9.8%) and in 154 patients in pT3 stage (34.3%). The mean catheterization time was 6.2 days. The 12 month follow up indicated continence rate of 91.9% and potency rates of 34% in the unilateral nerve sparing group and 69.8% in the bilateral group. In the intrafascial nsEERPE group potency rates were 33.3% (unilateral) and 79.1% (bilateral) after 12 months. Postoperative positive surgical margins rate were 6.1% for pT2 and 20% for pT3 and the complications rate 4%. The results of this large series of 1,300 patients are promising. The recently introduced intrafascial nsEERPE further ameliorates the outcome of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17334766     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-007-0156-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  23 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures.

Authors:  B Guillonneau; F Rozet; E Barret; X Cathelineau; G Vallancien
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  Technique of laparoscopic (endoscopic) radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  J-U Stolzenburg; M C Truss
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome.

Authors:  Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Laurent Salomon; Ran Katz; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Clement-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Michael Schulze; Dogu Teber; Othmar Seemann; Thomas Frede
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 5.  Laparoscopic prostatectomy: a promising option in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew P Steinberg; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.321

6.  Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  James A Brown; Christopher Garlitz; Leonard G Gomella; Scott G Hubosky; Stuart M Diamond; David McGinnis; Stephen E Strup
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Othmar Seemann; Michael Schulze; Dogu Teber; Martin Hatzinger; Thomas Frede
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Minh DO; Kossen Ho; Wolfgang Dorschner; Eginhard Waldkirch; Udo Jonas; Alexander Schütz; Lars Horn; Michael C Truss
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  Shilajit D Kundu; Kimberly A Roehl; Scott E Eggener; Jo Ann V Antenor; Misop Han; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  J A Wieder; M S Soloway
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and outcome.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Odysseas Andrikopoulos; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Iason Kyriazis; Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: The European and US Experience.

Authors:  Julia Finkelstein; Elisabeth Eckersberger; Helen Sadri; Samir S Taneja; Herbert Lepor; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Prevention and management of perioperative complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Evangelos Liatsikos; Robert Rabenalt; Martin Burchardt; Miguel-Ramirez Backhaus; Minh Do; Anja Dietel; Johanna Wasserscheid; Costantinos Constantinides; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Michael C Truss; Thomas R Herrmann; Roman Ganzer; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  [Laparascopic radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  R Ganzer; M Do; B P Rai; A Dietel; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Long-term oncological and functional results of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: one surgical team's experience on 1,600 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Paolo Verze; Salvatore Scuzzarella; Giorgio R Martina; Pierluigi Giummelli; Federico Cantoni; Vincenzo Mirone
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Assessment of low prostate weight as a determinant of a higher positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective pathologic study of 1,500 cases.

Authors:  Peiguo G Chu; Sean K Lau; Lawrence M Weiss; Mark Kawachi; Jeffrey Yoshida; Christopher Ruel; Rebecca Nelson; Laura Crocitto; Timothy Wilson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  High prostatic fascia release or standard nerve sparing? A viewpoint from the Royal Melbourne Hospital.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-08-28

9.  Anatomical description of the periprostatic nerves in the male rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Roman Ganzer; Jochen Neuhaus; Christian Gratzke; Andreas Blana; Wolf F Wieland; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Evaluation of complications in endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in a modular training programme: a multicentre experience.

Authors:  Roman Ganzer; Robert Rabenalt; Michael C Truss; Stefanos Papadoukakis; Minh Do; Andreas Blana; Markus Straub; Stefan Denzinger; Wolf F Wieland; Martin Burchardt; Thomas Herrmann; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.