Literature DB >> 11277064

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures.

B Guillonneau1, F Rozet, E Barret, X Cathelineau, G Vallancien.   

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy can be successfully performed by transperitoneal laparoscopy by a urologic team experienced in laparoscopy and radical prostatectomy. Operative and postoperative morbidity rates are low. Postoperative pain is minimal, allowing reduction of the length of hospital stay. The oncologic results seem satisfactory based on short-term follow-up. The improvement of the quality of intraoperative vision related to magnification of the image allows a more precise procedure. This subjective improvement of the quality of dissection should reduce the usual functional sequelae of conventional radical prostatectomy, such as incontinence and impotence. This finding needs to be confirmed by a larger series of patients with longer follow-up. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is now performed routinely and is proposed as a first-line surgical treatment for localized prostatic cancer at the authors' center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11277064     DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(01)80021-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  20 in total

1.  Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)--technical improvements and development of a nerve-sparing, potency-preserving approach.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Michael C Truss; Minh Do; Robert Rabenalt; Heidemarie Pfeiffer; Michael Dunzinger; Bernd Aedtner; Christian G Stief; Udo Jonas; Wolfgang Dorschner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Results after 300 procedures].

Authors:  J-U Stolzenburg; M C Truss; R Rabenalt; M Do; H Pfeiffer; A Bekos; J Neuhaus; C G Stief; U Jonas; W Dorschner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Minh Do; Michael C Truss; Martin Burchardt; Thomas R Herrmann; Thilo Schwalenberg; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Justin Harmon; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Barret; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  [Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: update 2008].

Authors:  H John
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Robotic prostatectomy: The new standard of care or a marketing success?

Authors:  Eric P Estey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  The robotic invasion of Canada.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Modified posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction decreases the posterior vesicourethral angle and improves urinary continence recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Keiichi Ito; Seguchi Kenji; Hidehiko Yoshii; Shinsuke Hamada; Junichi Asakuma; Shinsuke Tasaki; Kenji Kuroda; Akinori Sato; Akio Horiguchi; Tomohiko Asano
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-12

9.  Evolution of health-related quality of life two to seven years after retropubic radical prostatectomy: evaluation by UCLA prostate cancer index.

Authors:  Aurélien Descazeaud; Marc Zerbib; Matthias D Hofer; Joël Chaskalovic; Bernard Debré; Michaël Peyromaure
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Management of the complications of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Penner Schraudenbach; Carlos E Bermejo
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.