Literature DB >> 12893338

Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome.

Aristotelis G Anastasiadis1, Laurent Salomon, Ran Katz, Andras Hoznek, Dominique Chopin, Clement-Claude Abbou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare prospectively the functional results (urinary continence and erectile function) after retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: From 1998 to 2001, 300 patients underwent radical prostatectomy, 70 by the retropubic and 230 by the laparoscopic approach. All of them completed a confidential, self-administered questionnaire regarding urinary continence and erectile function before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The results were analyzed separately for day and nighttime urinary continence and by neurovascular bundle status and age for erectile function.
RESULTS: No differences were found between the two groups except for the duration of bladder catheterization (7.8 days for the retropubic and 5.8 for the laparoscopic approach, P = 0.0006). Before surgery, 296 patients (98.7%) were continent and 290 (96.6%) were potent. One year after surgery, diurnal urinary continence increased progressively to 66.7% and 71.6% (P >0.05), nocturnal continence to 66.7% and 87.1% (P = 0.008), and potency rates to 30% and 41% (P >0.05) for the retropubic and the laparoscopic approaches, respectively. After preservation of one and two neurovascular bundles, the potency rate increased to 27% and 46% and 44% and 53% for the retropubic and laparoscopic approaches, respectively (P >0.05). For patients younger than 60 years old with bilateral neurovascular bundle preservation, the potency rates were 72% and 81% (P >0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The two approaches showed similar outcomes regarding continence and erectile function 1 year after surgery. However, the recovery of nocturnal continence seemed to occur earlier after the laparoscopic approach. It is necessary to conduct additional studies to determine the potential benefits of the laparoscopic approach regarding nocturnal continence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12893338     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00352-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  30 in total

Review 1.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

3.  Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Minh Do; Michael C Truss; Martin Burchardt; Thomas R Herrmann; Thilo Schwalenberg; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Treatment- and disease-related complications of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anne R Simoneau
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

6.  Erectile function recovery rate after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raanan Tal; Hannah H Alphs; Paul Krebs; Christian J Nelson; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 7.  Prevalence of post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and a review of the recommended therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  Thiago Fernandes Negris Lima; Joshua Bitran; Fabio Stefano Frech; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Impact of posterior urethral plate repair on continence following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Isaac Yi Kim; Eun A Hwang; Chinedu Mmeje; Matthew Ercolani; Dong Hyeon Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 9.  Post-prostatectomy incontinence: Etiology, evaluation, and management.

Authors:  Nirmish Singla; Ajay K Singla
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-03

10.  Optimizing postoperative sexual function after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Manuela Tutolo; Alberto Briganti; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Gallina; Firas Abdollah; Umberto Capitanio; Marco Bianchi; Niccolò Passoni; Alessandro Nini; Nicola Fossati; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.