Literature DB >> 18813992

Assessment of low prostate weight as a determinant of a higher positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective pathologic study of 1,500 cases.

Peiguo G Chu1, Sean K Lau, Lawrence M Weiss, Mark Kawachi, Jeffrey Yoshida, Christopher Ruel, Rebecca Nelson, Laura Crocitto, Timothy Wilson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The assessment of prostate weight as a determinant of a high prostate margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has not been studied.
METHODS: Prospective pathologic findings of 1,500 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP, 399 cases) and da Vinci prostatectomy (DVP, 1,101 cases) between December 2000 to June 2006 at City of Hope National Medical Center were evaluated. Gleason score, pathologic stage, the presence or absence of positive margins, extraprostatic tumor extension, and seminal vesicle involvement by tumor were recorded in all patients. Preoperational serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels were recorded in all but 13 cases. These parameters were then correlated with prostate weight.
RESULTS: Of 1,500 patients, 345 had one or more positive margins (23%). Patients with low median prostate weight (49 g) had a significantly higher positive margin rate (p < 0.0001) and incidence of extraprostatic extension by tumor (p = 0.04), and were 1.523 times more likely to have positive margins [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.167-1.985].
CONCLUSION: We conclude that low prostate weight may be a determinant of a higher recurrence rate and more aggressive disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18813992     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0131-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches.

Authors:  Thierry Roumeguere; Renaud Bollens; Marc Vanden Bossche; Dan Rochet; David Bialek; Paul Hoffman; Thierry Quackels; Amir Damoun; Eric Wespes; Claude C Schulman; Alexandre R Zlotta
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Minh Do; Michael C Truss; Martin Burchardt; Thomas R Herrmann; Thilo Schwalenberg; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C M Chang; D Moon; T R Gianduzzo; C G Eden
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  M L Blute; D G Bostwick; E J Bergstralh; J M Slezak; S K Martin; C L Amling; H Zincke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in complex surgical cases.

Authors:  Alejandro R Rodriguez; Rachna Kapoor; Julio M Pow-Sang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Impact of prostate size in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Judd Boczko; Erdal Erturk; Dragan Golijanin; Ralph Madeb; Hitendra Patel; Jean V Joseph
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; William B Isaacs; Elizabeth A Platz; Martha K Terris; William J Aronson; Christopher L Amling; Joseph C Presti; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center.

Authors:  Laurent Salomon; Olivier Levrel; Alexandre de la Taille; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Fabien Saint; Safawat Zaki; Dimitrios Vordos; Antony Cicco; L Eric Olsson; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Clement-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Survival of patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Michael G Oefelein; Piyush K Agarwal; Martin I Resnick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Independent prognostic factors in patients with metastatic (stage D2) prostate cancer. The Zoladex Study Group.

Authors:  G W Chodak; N J Vogelzang; R J Caplan; M Soloway; J A Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Robotic Prostatectomy Has a Superior Outcome in Larger Prostates and PSA Density Is a Strong Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  S Bishara; N Vasdev; T Lane; G Boustead; J Adshead
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2014-12-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.