Literature DB >> 20561575

Responses of the ear to low frequency sounds, infrasound and wind turbines.

Alec N Salt1, Timothy E Hullar.   

Abstract

Infrasonic sounds are generated internally in the body (by respiration, heartbeat, coughing, etc) and by external sources, such as air conditioning systems, inside vehicles, some industrial processes and, now becoming increasingly prevalent, wind turbines. It is widely assumed that infrasound presented at an amplitude below what is audible has no influence on the ear. In this review, we consider possible ways that low frequency sounds, at levels that may or may not be heard, could influence the function of the ear. The inner ear has elaborate mechanisms to attenuate low frequency sound components before they are transmitted to the brain. The auditory portion of the ear, the cochlea, has two types of sensory cells, inner hair cells (IHC) and outer hair cells (OHC), of which the IHC are coupled to the afferent fibers that transmit "hearing" to the brain. The sensory stereocilia ("hairs") on the IHC are "fluid coupled" to mechanical stimuli, so their responses depend on stimulus velocity and their sensitivity decreases as sound frequency is lowered. In contrast, the OHC are directly coupled to mechanical stimuli, so their input remains greater than for IHC at low frequencies. At very low frequencies the OHC are stimulated by sounds at levels below those that are heard. Although the hair cells in other sensory structures such as the saccule may be tuned to infrasonic frequencies, auditory stimulus coupling to these structures is inefficient so that they are unlikely to be influenced by airborne infrasound. Structures that are involved in endolymph volume regulation are also known to be influenced by infrasound, but their sensitivity is also thought to be low. There are, however, abnormal states in which the ear becomes hypersensitive to infrasound. In most cases, the inner ear's responses to infrasound can be considered normal, but they could be associated with unfamiliar sensations or subtle changes in physiology. This raises the possibility that exposure to the infrasound component of wind turbine noise could influence the physiology of the ear. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20561575      PMCID: PMC2923251          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  79 in total

1.  Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; F P Harris; B B Stagner; M D Hawkins; G K Martin
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1990-05

2.  Automatic monitoring of mechano-electrical transduction in the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  R Patuzzi; A Moleirinho
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  The acoustic two-tone distortions 2f1-f2 and f2-f1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  G Frank; M Kössl
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Low-frequency modulation of inner hair cell and organ of Corti responses in the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  M A Cheatham; P Dallos
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Variation of membrane properties in hair cells isolated from the turtle cochlea.

Authors:  J J Art; R Fettiplace
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Functional role of the olivo-cochlear bundle: a motor unit control system in the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  E L LePage
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Frequency-dependent self-induced bias of the basilar membrane and its potential for controlling sensitivity and tuning in the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  E L LePage
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Antidromic responses of single units from the spiral ganglion.

Authors:  M C Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Acoustically responsive fibers in the vestibular nerve of the cat.

Authors:  M P McCue; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Frequency and velocity of rotational head perturbations during locomotion.

Authors:  G E Grossman; R J Leigh; L A Abel; D J Lanska; S E Thurston
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  17 in total

1.  Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Measured Below 300 Hz in Normal-Hearing Human Subjects.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Rodrigo Ordoñez; Dorte Hammershøi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-21

Review 2.  Modelling cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Guangjian Ni; Stephen J Elliott; Mohammad Ayat; Paul D Teal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  [Infrasound - implications for human medicine].

Authors:  J M Vahl; J V A Keppeler; D Krahe; K Bahrke-Rein; R Reiter; T K Hoffmann; E Goldberg-Bockhorn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 1.330

Review 4.  Health effects and wind turbines: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Loren D Knopper; Christopher A Ollson
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Auditory recognition of familiar and unfamiliar subjects with wind turbine noise.

Authors:  Luigi Maffei; Massimiliano Masullo; Maria Di Gabriele; Nefta-Eleftheria P Votsi; John D Pantis; Vincenzo Paolo Senese
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Wind turbines: a different breed of noise?

Authors:  Nate Seltenrich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Wind turbines and human health.

Authors:  Loren D Knopper; Christopher A Ollson; Lindsay C McCallum; Melissa L Whitfield Aslund; Robert G Berger; Kathleen Souweine; Mary McDaniel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-06-19

8.  Musical interfaces: visualization and reconstruction of music with a microfluidic two-phase flow.

Authors:  Sze Yi Mak; Zida Li; Arnaud Frere; Tat Chuen Chan; Ho Cheung Shum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Health effects related to wind turbine noise exposure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jesper Hvass Schmidt; Mads Klokker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Health-based audible noise guidelines account for infrasound and low-frequency noise produced by wind turbines.

Authors:  Robert G Berger; Payam Ashtiani; Christopher A Ollson; Melissa Whitfield Aslund; Lindsay C McCallum; Geoff Leventhall; Loren D Knopper
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.