| Literature DB >> 17331231 |
Laura Caggiari1, Massimo Guidoboni, Emanuela Vaccher, Luigi Barzan, Giovanni Franchin, Annunziata Gloghini, Debora Martorelli, Paola Zancai, Maria Teresa Bortolin, Mario Mazzucato, Diego Serraino, Antonino Carbone, Paolo De Paoli, Riccardo Dolcetti.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Engagement of CD40 promotes survival of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (UNPC) cells and similar effects are induced by the EBV oncoprotein LMP-1 that is expressed in a fraction of cases. Considering that CD40 may be activated also by the soluble isoform of CD40L (sCD40L), we investigated the serum levels of sCD40L in a series of 61 UNPC patients from Italy, a non-endemic area for this disease.Entities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17331231 PMCID: PMC1819365 DOI: 10.1186/1750-9378-2-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Agent Cancer ISSN: 1750-9378 Impact factor: 2.965
Distribution of 61 patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (UNPC) according to selected characteristics. North-East Italy, 1994–2003.
| Range | 14–78 |
| Median | 49.6 |
| N. (%) | |
| Female | 17 (27.9) |
| Male | 44 (72.1) |
| T1 | 13 (21.7) |
| T2 | 27 (45.0) |
| T3 | 11 (18.3) |
| T4 | 9 (15.0) |
| N0 | 13 (22.1) |
| N1 | 23 (39.0) |
| N2 | 12 (20.3) |
| N3 | 11 (18.6) |
| M0 | 51 (86.4) |
| M1 | 8 (13.6) |
| I-II | 20 (32.8) |
| III-IV | 32 (52.5) |
| High | 20 (32.8) |
| Medium-low | 41 (67.2) |
Figure 1UNPC patients (n = 61) show increased levels of serum sCD40L compared to healthy donors (n = 71) matched for sex and age. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Comparison of patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma according to sCD40L levels and personal characteristics and presenting clinical features. North-East Italy, 1994–2003.
| No. | (%) | No. | % | ||
| <= 39 | 8 | (40.0) | 8 | (20.0) | |
| 40–54 | 9 | (45.0) | 14 | (35.0) | |
| >= 55 | 3 | (15.0) | 18 | (45.0) | 0.02 |
| Men | 16 | (80.0) | 28 | (68.3) | |
| Women | 4 | (20.0) | 13 | (31.7) | 0.51 |
| 1 | 4 | (20.0) | 9 | (23.1) | |
| 2A-2B | 8 | (40.0) | 18 | (46.2) | |
| 3–4 | 8 | (40.0) | 12 | (30.8) | 0.78 |
| 0 | 2 | (10.0) | 11 | (28.9) | |
| 1 | 10 | (50.0) | 12 | (31.6) | |
| 2–3 | 8 | (40.0) | 15 | (39.5) | 0.36 |
| 0 | 13 | (68.4) | 38 | (95.0) | |
| 1 | 6 | (31.6) | 2 | (5.0) | 0.01 |
| I-II | 6 | (31.6) | 14 | (42.4) | |
| III-IVa-IVb | 7 | (36.8) | 17 | (51.5) | |
| IVc | 6 | (31.6) | 2 | (6.1) | 0.11 |
| Negative cases | 23 | (95.8) | 19 | (70.4) | |
| Positive cases | 1 | (4.2) | 8 | (29.6) | 0.03 |
§In some items, the sum does not add up to the total because of missing values
Figure 2Detection of LMP-1 expression by immunohistochemistry (red) in UNPC tumor cells. Alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase, original magnification ×250.
Figure 3Membrane CD40L expression by stimulated CD3+CD8- circulating T lymphocytes in UNPC patients and healthy donors. The analysis was carried out using a two-color flow cytometric assay coupled with a previously described gating strategy [42]. The percentage of stimulated CD3+CD8- expressing membrane CD40L is indicated on the y axis. A significantly lower percentage of CD3+CD8- T cells from UNPC patients up-regulated CD40L upon stimulation as compared to controls (p < 0.001). The difference remained statistically significant also after correction for the number of CD4+ cells.
Figure 4Immunohistochemical detection (on frozen tissue sections) of CD40L+ cells within UNPC microenvironment. CD40L positivity is manifested as dot-like staining on isolated small lymphocytes. A. The figure shows a high content of CD40L+ lymphocytes, either intermingled with tumor cells or located around UNPC tumor nests, in a case (female, 37 years old) with high serum levels of sCD40L. B. The figure shows few CD40L+ lymphocytes in a case (male, 34 years old) with a low content of sCD40L. Original magnification ×250.
Comparison of patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma according to sCD40L levels and treatment-related factors. North-East Italy, 1994–2003.
| Therapy | No. | (%) | No. | (%) | |
| CT | 3 | (15.0) | 7 | (17.1) | |
| RT | 6 | (30.0) | 10 | (24.4) | |
| CT+RT | 11 | (55.0) | 24 | (58.5) | 0.89 |
| Complete remission | 15 | (83.3) | 29 | (80.6) | |
| Partial/Progression | 3 | (16.7) | 7 | (19.4) | 0.80 |
| None | 12 | (80.0) | 20 | (69.0) | |
| Loco-regional | 0 | (0.0) | 7 | (24.1) | |
| Distance | 3 | (20.0) | 2 | (6.9) | 0.07 |
§In some items, the sum does not add up to the total because of missing values.