Literature DB >> 17329665

Beyond effectiveness: evaluating the public health impact of the WISEWOMAN program.

Rosanne P Farris1, Julie C Will, Olga Khavjou, Eric A Finkelstein.   

Abstract

Interventions that are effective are often improperly or only partially implemented when put into practice. When intervention programs are evaluated, feasibility of implementation and effectiveness need to be examined. Reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance make up the RE-AIM framework used to assess such programs. To examine the usefulness of this metric, we addressed 2 key research questions. Is it feasible to operationalize the RE-AIM framework using women's health program data? How does the determination of a successful program differ if the criterion is (1) effectiveness alone, (2) reach and effectiveness, or (3) the 5 dimensions of the RE-AIM framework? Findings indicate that it is feasible to operationalize the RE-AIM concepts and that RE-AIM may provide a richer measure of contextual factors for program success compared with other evaluation approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17329665      PMCID: PMC1829343          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.072264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

1.  From research to "best practices" in other settings and populations.

Authors:  L W Green
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services--methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

Authors:  P A Briss; S Zaza; M Pappaioanou; J Fielding; L Wright-De Agüero; B I Truman; D P Hopkins; P D Mullen; R S Thompson; S H Woolf; V G Carande-Kulis; L Anderson; A R Hinman; D V McQueen; S M Teutsch; J R Harris
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Developing the Guide to Community Preventive Services--overview and rationale. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

Authors:  B I Truman; C K Smith-Akin; A R Hinman; K M Gebbie; R Brownson; L F Novick; R S Lawrence; M Pappaioanou; J Fielding; C A Evans; F A Guerra; M Vogel-Taylor; C S Mahan; M Fullilove; S Zaza
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Community science: bridging the gap between science and practice with community-centered models.

Authors:  Abraham Wandersman
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2003-06

Review 5.  Achieving 'best practice' in health promotion: improving the fit between research and practice.

Authors:  D Nutbeam
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  1996-09

6.  Integrating individual and public health perspectives for treatment of tobacco dependence under managed health care: a combined stepped-care and matching model.

Authors:  D B Abrams; C T Orleans; R S Niaura; M G Goldstein; J O Prochaska; W Velicer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996

Review 7.  Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs.

Authors:  B R Flay
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Beginning with the application in mind: designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination.

Authors:  Lisa M Klesges; Paul A Estabrooks; David A Dzewaltowski; Sheana S Bull; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2005-04

9.  The scientific approach to cancer control.

Authors:  P Greenwald; J W Cullen
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Health promotion interventions for disadvantaged women: overview of the WISEWOMAN projects.

Authors:  Julie C Will; Rosanne P Farris; Charlene G Sanders; Chrisandra K Stockmyer; Eric A Finkelstein
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.681

View more
  19 in total

1.  Reaiming RE-AIM: using the model to plan, implement, and evaluate the effects of environmental change approaches to enhancing population health.

Authors:  Diane K King; Russell E Glasgow; Bonnie Leeman-Castillo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A comparison of breast and cervical cancer legislation and screening in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.

Authors:  Stephanie Miles-Richardson; Daniel Blumenthal; Ernest Alema-Mensah
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-05

3.  The StrongWomen-Healthy Hearts program in Pennsylvania: RE-AIM analysis.

Authors:  Sara C Folta; Alice H Lichtenstein; Rebecca A Seguin; Jeanne P Goldberg; Marilyn A Corbin; Nancy Wiker; Jodi Gauker; Kenneth Chui; Miriam E Nelson
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  Network analysis of RE-AIM framework: chronology of the field and the connectivity of its contributors.

Authors:  Jo Ann Shoup; Bridget Gaglio; Danielle Varda; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time.

Authors:  Bridget Gaglio; Jo Ann Shoup; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Healthy Eating for Life English as a second language curriculum: applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a nutrition education intervention targeting cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  J L Martinez; L R Duncan; S E Rivers; M C Bertoli; A E Latimer-Cheung; P Salovey
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  A statewide intervention reduces BMI in adults: Shape Up Rhode Island results.

Authors:  Rena R Wing; Angela M Pinto; Melissa M Crane; Rajiv Kumar; Brad M Weinberg; Amy A Gorin
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Evaluating an insurance-sponsored weight management program with the RE-AIM Model, West Virginia, 2004-2008.

Authors:  Christiaan G Abildso; Sam J Zizzi; Bill Reger-Nash
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Brief cognitive behavioral therapy in primary care: a hybrid type 2 patient-randomized effectiveness-implementation design.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Cully; Maria E A Armento; Juliette Mott; Michael R Nadorff; Aanand D Naik; Melinda A Stanley; Kristen H Sorocco; Mark E Kunik; Nancy J Petersen; Michael R Kauth
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Applying the RE-AIM framework to the Alberta's Caring for Diabetes Project: a protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of primary care quality improvement interventions.

Authors:  Lisa Wozniak; Sandra Rees; Allison Soprovich; Fatima Al Sayah; Steven T Johnson; Sumit R Majumdar; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.