Literature DB >> 3534875

Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs.

B R Flay.   

Abstract

The concepts of efficacy and effectiveness are examined from the viewpoints of the traditions and philosophies of health-care research and social program evaluation. Consideration of the status of the program being assessed, its availability to, and its acceptance by the target audience leads to the derivation of four levels of health promotion program testing: efficacy trials, under optimum conditions of program implementation and recipient participation; treatment effectiveness trials, with expected variation in target audience acceptance; implementation effectiveness trials, under varying conditions of implementation; and program evaluation of previously untested programs. These four levels of testing, together with experience in one area of health promotion research (smoking prevention), suggest eight phases of research for the development of health promotion programs: basic research, hypothesis development, pilot applied research, prototype evaluation studies, efficacy trials, treatment effectiveness trials, implementation effectiveness trials, and demonstration evaluations. Issues of design, the use of random assignment, the use of blinding procedures, and of the role of process evaluation in these different research levels, particularly efficacy and effectiveness trials, are considered in light of the terminologies and methods of health-care and social program evaluation research. Suggestions are made for improved health promotion research.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3534875     DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(86)90024-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  172 in total

Review 1.  Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions.

Authors:  L Rychetnik; M Frommer; P Hawe; A Shiell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Effects of the Positive Action program on achievement and discipline: two matched-control comparisons.

Authors:  B R Flay; C G Allred; N Ordway
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2001-06

3.  Increasing use of mammography among older, rural African American women: results from a community trial.

Authors:  Jo Anne Earp; Eugenia Eng; Michael S O'Malley; Mary Altpeter; Garth Rauscher; Linda Mayne; Holly F Mathews; Kathy S Lynch; Bahjat Qaqish
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Evaluation of a culturally appropriate smoking cessation intervention for Latinos.

Authors:  S I Woodruff; G A Talavera; J P Elder
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Partnerships for the design, conduct, and analysis of effectiveness, and implementation research: experiences of the prevention science and methodology group.

Authors:  C Hendricks Brown; Sheppard G Kellam; Sheila Kaupert; Bengt O Muthén; Wei Wang; Linda K Muthén; Patricia Chamberlain; Craig L PoVey; Rick Cady; Thomas W Valente; Mitsunori Ogihara; Guillermo J Prado; Hilda M Pantin; Carlos G Gallo; José Szapocznik; Sara J Czaja; John W McManus
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2012-07

6.  Evaluating the dissemination of Body & Soul, an evidence-based fruit and vegetable intake intervention: challenges for dissemination and implementation research.

Authors:  Marlyn Allicock; Marci K Campbell; Carmina G Valle; Carol Carr; Ken Resnicow; Ziya Gizlice
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.045

7.  Feasibility of implementing intervention methods in an adolescent worksite tobacco control study.

Authors:  M K Hunt; P Fagan; R Lederman; A Stoddard; L Frazier; K Girod; G Sorensen
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  The feasibility of evaluating a tobacco control intervention for working youth.

Authors:  P Fagan; A M Stoddard; M K Hunt; L Frazier; K Girod; G Sorensen
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  An Algorithm for Creating Virtual Controls Using Integrated and Harmonized Longitudinal Data.

Authors:  William B Hansen; Shyh-Huei Chen; Santiago Saldana; Edward H Ip
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Efficacy versus effectiveness study design within the European screening trial for prostate cancer: consequences for cancer incidence, overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality.

Authors:  Xiaoye Zhu; Pim J van Leeuwen; Erik Holmberg; Meelan Bul; Sigrid Carlsson; Fritz H Schröder; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.