Literature DB >> 9751438

Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space.

D Bächtold1, M Baumüller, P Brugger.   

Abstract

Spatial stimulus response (S-R) compatibility designates the observation that speeded reactions to unilateral stimuli are faster for the hand ipsilateral than for the hand contralateral to the sensory hemifield containing the stimulus. In two experiments involving presentation of the numbers 1 to 11 in the center of the visual field we show (1) a left-hand reaction time (RT) advantage for numerals < 6 and a right-hand advantage for those > 6 for subjects who conceive of the numbers as distances on a ruler, and (2) a reversal of this RT advantage for subjects who conceive of them as hours on a clock face. While the results in the first task (RULER) replicate a robust finding from the neuropsychology of number processing (the "SNARC effect") those in the second task (CLOCK) show that extension of the number scale from left to right in representational space cannot be the decisive factor for the observed interaction between hand and number size. Taken together, the findings in the two tasks are best accounted for in terms of an interaction between lateralized mental representations and lateralized motor outputs (i.e. an analog of traditional spatial S-R compatibility effects in representational space). We discuss potential clinical applications of the two tasks in patients with neglect of representational space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9751438     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00002-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  73 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ito; Takeshi Hatta
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

3.  Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-04-10

4.  SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).

Authors:  Katarzyna Patro; Samuel Shaki
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-12-29

5.  The number-time interaction depends on relative magnitude in the suprasecond range.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamamoto; Kyoshiro Sasaki; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-12-08

6.  Dynamic mental number line in simple arithmetic.

Authors:  Xiaodan Yu; Jie Liu; Dawei Li; Hang Liu; Jiaxin Cui; Xinlin Zhou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-08

7.  Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: evidence for a response-related origin.

Authors:  Inge M Keus; Wolf Schwarz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

8.  Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion?

Authors:  Maria Dolores de Hevia; Luisa Girelli; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The number line effect reflects top-down control.

Authors:  Jelena Ristic; Alissa Wright; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

10.  Observation of directional storybook reading influences young children's counting direction.

Authors:  Silke M Göbel; Koleen McCrink; Martin H Fischer; Samuel Shaki
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.