Literature DB >> 18430936

Interactions between stressful environment and gene deletions alleviate the expected average loss of fitness in yeast.

Lukasz Jasnos1, Katarzyna Tomala, Dorota Paczesniak, Ryszard Korona.   

Abstract

The conjecture that the deleterious effects of mutations are amplified by stress or interaction with one another remains unsatisfactorily tested. It is now possible to reapproach this problem systematically by using genomic collections of mutants and applying stress-inducing conditions with a well-recognized impact on metabolism. We measured the maximum growth rate of single- and double-gene deletion strains of yeast in several stress-inducing treatments, including poor nutrients, elevated temperature, high salinity, and the addition of caffeine. The negative impact of deletions on the maximum growth rate was relatively smaller in stressful than in favorable conditions. In both benign and harsh environments, double-deletion strains grew on average slightly faster than expected from a multiplicative model of interaction between single growth effects, indicating positive epistasis for the rate of growth. This translates to even higher positive epistasis for fitness defined as the number of progeny. We conclude that the negative impact of metabolic disturbances, regardless of whether they are of environmental or genetic origin, is absolutely and relatively highest when growth is fastest. The effect of further damages tends to be weaker. This results in an average alleviating effect of interactions between stressful environment and gene deletions and among gene deletions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18430936      PMCID: PMC2323800          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.084533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  52 in total

1.  Large-scale phenotypic analysis reveals identical contributions to cell functions of known and unknown yeast genes.

Authors:  M M Bianchi; S Ngo; M Vandenbol; G Sartori; A Morlupi; C Ricci; S Stefani; G B Morlino; F Hilger; G Carignani; P P Slonimski; L Frontali
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.239

2.  The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  L L Vassilieva; A M Hook; M Lynch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Epistatic buffering of fitness loss in yeast double deletion strains.

Authors:  Lukasz Jasnos; Ryszard Korona
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-02-25       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution fitness profiling of combinatorial gene deletions.

Authors:  Robert P St Onge; Ramamurthy Mani; Julia Oh; Michael Proctor; Eula Fung; Ronald W Davis; Corey Nislow; Frederick P Roth; Guri Giaever
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Effect of varying epistasis on the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  Roger D Kouyos; Sarah P Otto; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism.

Authors:  Daniel Segrè; Alexander Deluna; George M Church; Roy Kishony
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-12-12       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; D Houle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 9.  Cell wall integrity signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  David E Levin
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 11.056

10.  Understanding the evolutionary fate of finite populations: the dynamics of mutational effects.

Authors:  Olin K Silander; Olivier Tenaillon; Lin Chao
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  16 in total

1.  Temporal variation in selection accelerates mutational decay by Muller's ratchet.

Authors:  Alison M Wardlaw; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Experimental genomics of fitness in yeast.

Authors:  Graham Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K MacLellan; L Kwan; M C Whitlock; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  The fitness cost of rifampicin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa depends on demand for RNA polymerase.

Authors:  Alex R Hall; James C Iles; R Craig MacLean
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Abiotic stress does not magnify the deleterious effects of spontaneous mutations.

Authors:  J R Andrew; M M Dossey; V O Garza; M Keller-Pearson; C F Baer; J Joyner-Matos
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 6.  The causes of epistasis.

Authors:  J Arjan G M de Visser; Tim F Cooper; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Runaway coevolution: adaptation to heritable and nonheritable environments.

Authors:  Devin M Drown; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Measuring competitive fitness in dynamic environments.

Authors:  Ivan A Razinkov; Bridget L Baumgartner; Matthew R Bennett; Lev S Tsimring; Jeff Hasty
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Epistasis for growth rate and total metabolic flux in yeast.

Authors:  Agata Jakubowska; Ryszard Korona
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fast growth increases the selective advantage of a mutation arising recurrently during evolution under metal limitation.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Chou; Julia Berthet; Christopher J Marx
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.