Literature DB >> 17318591

Asking the right questions: investigating needs assessments and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires for use in oncology clinical practice.

Claire F Snyder1, Sydney M Dy, Danetta E Hendricks, Julie R Brahmer, Michael A Carducci, Antonio C Wolff, Albert W Wu.   

Abstract

GOALS OF WORK: Questionnaires used in oncology practice for individual patient management need to address issues patients find important and want help with and issues cancer center health professionals can address. We investigated the item content from two health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires and two needs assessments for this purpose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this preliminary study, 61 cancer patients and 19 cancer center health professionals rated the item content from the EORTC-QLQ-C30, FACT-G, Supportive Care Needs Survey-34 (SCNS), and Kingston Needs Assessment--Cancer. Patients rated each item's importance and whether they wanted help with it; health professionals rated each item's importance and whether they felt able to help patients address it. Patients and health professionals also reported their overall questionnaire preference. MAIN
RESULTS: Patients rated information about treatments (options, benefits, side effects) and care coordination as the most important issues and those for which they most wanted help from their health professionals. Health professionals rated pain and other symptom/side effect items as most important to patients and those for which they were most able to help. Findings were consistent across tumor type and treatment status. Patients had an overall preference for the SCNS. Health professionals had no clear questionnaire preference.
CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that the issues patients most want help with may not be the issues that health professionals feel most able to address. If these findings are confirmed in more representative samples, interventions may be needed to assist health professionals in managing cancer patients' HRQOL issues and needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17318591     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-007-0223-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  27 in total

1.  Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic.

Authors:  L E Carlson; M Speca; N Hagen; P Taenzer
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.250

2.  The use of quality of life data in clinical practice.

Authors:  J Morris; D Perez; B McNoe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group.

Authors:  R Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; A Boyes; B Bonevski; L Burton; P Cook
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Quality of life dimensions that are most important to cancer patients.

Authors:  R T Skeel
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study.

Authors:  S B Detmar; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Improving patient quality of life with feedback to physicians about functional status.

Authors:  L V Rubenstein; J M McCoy; D W Cope; P A Barrett; S H Hirsch; K S Messer; R T Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice.

Authors:  E P Wright; P J Selby; M Crawford; A Gillibrand; C Johnston; T J Perren; R Rush; A Smith; G Velikova; K Watson; A Gould; A Cull
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology.

Authors:  G Velikova; J M Brown; A B Smith; P J Selby
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  35 in total

1.  Identifying changes in scores on the EORTC-QLQ-C30 representing a change in patients' supportive care needs.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Amanda L Blackford; Jonathan Sussman; Daryl Bainbridge; Doris Howell; Hsien Y Seow; Michael A Carducci; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Improving patient-centered medical-surgical nursing practice with quality-of-life assessment.

Authors:  Angela Starkweather
Journal:  Medsurg Nurs       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

3.  Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Shim; Kyung-Sook Lee; Jong-Hyock Park; Jae-Hyun Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Evaluating patients for psychosocial distress and supportive care needs based on health-related quality of life in primary brain tumors: a prospective multicenter analysis of patients with gliomas in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  Anne-Katrin Hickmann; Marlene Hechtner; Minou Nadji-Ohl; Mareile Janko; Ann Katrin Reuter; Karoline Kohlmann; Markus Haug; Sonja Grüninger; Monika Deininger; Oliver Ganslandt; Jochem König; Christian Rainer Wirtz; Jan Coburger; Mirjam Renovanz
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Indigenous cancer patient and staff attitudes towards unmet needs screening using the SCNAT-IP.

Authors:  G Garvey; B Thewes; V F Y He; E Davis; A Girgis; P C Valery; K Giam; A Hocking; J Jackson; V Jones; D Yip
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  When using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice, the measure matters: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Joseph M Herman; Sharon M White; Brandon S Luber; Amanda L Blackford; Michael A Carducci; Albert W Wu
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Perception and fulfillment of cancer patients' nursing professional social support needs: from the health care personnel point of view.

Authors:  Jingfang Hong; Yongxia Song; Jingjing Liu; Weili Wang; Wenru Wang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Determinants and implications of cancer patients' psychosocial needs.

Authors:  N Ernstmann; M Neumann; O Ommen; M Galushko; M Wirtz; R Voltz; M Hallek; H Pfaff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Unmet care needs in people living with advanced cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nima Moghaddam; Helen Coxon; Sally Nabarro; Beth Hardy; Karen Cox
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Randomized clinical trial of an intensive nursing-based pain education program for cancer outpatients suffering from pain.

Authors:  Evelien H van der Peet; Marieke H J van den Beuken-van Everdingen; Jacob Patijn; Harry C Schouten; Maarten van Kleef; Annemie M Courtens
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.