Nima Moghaddam1, Helen Coxon2, Sally Nabarro2, Beth Hardy3, Karen Cox4. 1. College of Social Sciences, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, UK. nmoghaddam@lincoln.ac.uk. 2. CityCare, Nottingham, UK. 3. Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. 4. School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The support needs of cancer patients vary according to the phase of their cancer journey. Recent developments in healthcare are such that the advanced cancer phase is increasingly experienced as a chronic illness phase, with consequent changes in patient support needs. Understanding these needs, and identifying areas of unmet need, can enable us to develop services that are more adequate to the task of supporting this population. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of four electronic databases to identify studies examining the unmet needs of people living with advanced cancer. Relevant data were extracted and synthesised; meta-analyses were conducted to obtain pooled estimates for prevalence of needs. RESULTS: We identified 23 studies (4 qualitative) for inclusion. Unmet needs were identified across a broad range of domains, with greatest prevalence in informational (30-55 %), psychological (18-42 %), physical (17-48 %), and functional (17-37 %) domains. There was considerable heterogeneity amongst studies in terms of methods of assessment, coding and reporting of needs, respondent characteristics, and appraised study quality. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity made it difficult to compare across studies and inflated confidence intervals for pooled estimates of prevalence-we need standardised and comprehensive approaches to assessment and reporting of unmet needs to further our understanding. Nonetheless, the review identified prominent needs across a range of (interacting) experiential domains. Moreover, by focussing on unmet needs for support, we were able to extrapolate potential implications for service development.
PURPOSE: The support needs of cancerpatients vary according to the phase of their cancer journey. Recent developments in healthcare are such that the advanced cancer phase is increasingly experienced as a chronic illness phase, with consequent changes in patient support needs. Understanding these needs, and identifying areas of unmet need, can enable us to develop services that are more adequate to the task of supporting this population. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of four electronic databases to identify studies examining the unmet needs of people living with advanced cancer. Relevant data were extracted and synthesised; meta-analyses were conducted to obtain pooled estimates for prevalence of needs. RESULTS: We identified 23 studies (4 qualitative) for inclusion. Unmet needs were identified across a broad range of domains, with greatest prevalence in informational (30-55 %), psychological (18-42 %), physical (17-48 %), and functional (17-37 %) domains. There was considerable heterogeneity amongst studies in terms of methods of assessment, coding and reporting of needs, respondent characteristics, and appraised study quality. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity made it difficult to compare across studies and inflated confidence intervals for pooled estimates of prevalence-we need standardised and comprehensive approaches to assessment and reporting of unmet needs to further our understanding. Nonetheless, the review identified prominent needs across a range of (interacting) experiential domains. Moreover, by focussing on unmet needs for support, we were able to extrapolate potential implications for service development.
Authors: Rafaella Queiroga Souto; Vladimir Khanassov; Quan Nha Hong; Paula L Bush; Isabelle Vedel; Pierre Pluye Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Bart H P Osse; Myrra J F J Vernooij-Dassen; Egbert Schadé; Richard P T M Grol Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2005-02-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rebecca K S Wong; Edmee Franssen; Ewa Szumacher; Ruth Connolly; Marty Evans; Beverley Page; Edward Chow; Charles Hayter; Tamara Harth; Lourdes Andersson; Joan Pope; Cyril Danjoux Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2002-06-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: C Scaratti; M Leonardi; A Saladino; E Anghileri; M Broggi; E Lamperti; L Fariselli; R Ayadi; G Tringali; S Schiavolin Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Vanessa L Beesley; Matthew Burge; Monica Dumbrava; Jack Callum; Rachel E Neale; David K Wyld Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michelle A Mollica; Ashley Wilder Smith; Emily Tonorezos; Kathleen Castro; Kelly K Filipski; Jennifer Guida; Frank Perna; Paige Green; Paul B Jacobsen; Angela Mariotto; Gina Tesauro; Lisa Gallicchio Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Rebecca Selove; Maya Foster; Debra Wujcik; Maureen Sanderson; Pamela C Hull; David Shen-Miller; Steven Wolff; Debra Friedman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Tao Wang; Alex Molassiotis; Jing-Yu Tan; Betty Pui Man Chung; Hou-Qiang Huang Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Benjamin D Diplock; Kaitlin M C McGarragle; Willem A Mueller; Sana Haddad; Rachel Ehrlich; Dong-Hyun A Yoon; Xingshan Cao; Yaseen Al-Allaq; Paul Karanicolas; Margaret I Fitch; Jeff Myers; Alex J Mitchell; Janet W M Ellis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 3.603