Literature DB >> 25398495

Identifying changes in scores on the EORTC-QLQ-C30 representing a change in patients' supportive care needs.

Claire F Snyder1, Amanda L Blackford, Jonathan Sussman, Daryl Bainbridge, Doris Howell, Hsien Y Seow, Michael A Carducci, Albert W Wu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Using health-related quality-of-life measures for patient management requires knowing what changes in scores require clinical attention. We estimated changes on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life-Questionnaire-Core-30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30), representing important changes by comparing to patient-reported changes in supportive care needs.
METHODS: This secondary analysis used data from 193 newly diagnosed cancer patients (63 % breast, 37 % colorectal; mean age 60 years; 20 % male) from 28 Canadian surgical practices. Participants completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form-34 (SCNS-SF34) and EORTC-QLQ-C30 at baseline, 3, and 8 weeks. We calculated mean changes in EORTC-QLQ-C30 scores associated with improvement, worsening, and no change in supportive care needs based on the SCNS-SF34. Mean changes in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 scores associated with the SCNS-SF34 improved and worsened categories were used to estimate clinically important changes, and the 'no change' category to estimate insignificant changes.
RESULTS: EORTC-QLQ-C30 score changes ranged from 6 to 32 points for patients reporting improved supportive care needs; statistically significant changes were 10-32 points. EORTC-QLQ-C30 score changes ranged from 21-point worsening to 21-point improvement for patients reporting worsening supportive care needs; statistically significant changes were 9-21 points in the hypothesized direction and a 21-point statistically significant change in the opposite direction. EORTC-QLQ-C30 score changes ranged from a 1-point worsening to 16-point improvement for patients reporting stable supportive care needs.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest 10-point EORTC-QLQ-C30 score changes represent changes in supportive care needs. When using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in clinical practice, scores changing ≥10 points should be highlighted for clinical attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25398495      PMCID: PMC4405431          DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0853-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  27 in total

1.  Can patient-reported outcome measures identify cancer patients' most bothersome issues?

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Amanda L Blackford; Neil K Aaronson; Symone B Detmar; Michael A Carducci; Michael D Brundage; Albert W Wu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Minimal important differences for interpreting health-related quality of life scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 in lung cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  John T Maringwa; Chantal Quinten; Madeleine King; Jolie Ringash; David Osoba; Corneel Coens; Francesca Martinelli; Jurgen Vercauteren; Charles S Cleeland; Henning Flechtner; Carolyn Gotay; Eva Greimel; Martin J Taphoorn; Bryce B Reeve; Joseph Schmucker-Von Koch; Joachim Weis; Egbert F Smit; Jan P van Meerbeeck; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint: a web system for patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Amanda L Blackford; Antonio C Wolff; Michael A Carducci; Joseph M Herman; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.

Authors:  D Osoba; G Rodrigues; J Myles; B Zee; J Pater
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30.

Authors:  M T King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Patient participation in the consultation process: a structured review of intervention strategies.

Authors:  Kirstie Haywood; Susan Marshall; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-01-06

8.  Asking the right questions: investigating needs assessments and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires for use in oncology clinical practice.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Sydney M Dy; Danetta E Hendricks; Julie R Brahmer; Michael A Carducci; Antonio C Wolff; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  23 in total

1.  Evaluating patients for psychosocial distress and supportive care needs based on health-related quality of life in primary brain tumors: a prospective multicenter analysis of patients with gliomas in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  Anne-Katrin Hickmann; Marlene Hechtner; Minou Nadji-Ohl; Mareile Janko; Ann Katrin Reuter; Karoline Kohlmann; Markus Haug; Sonja Grüninger; Monika Deininger; Oliver Ganslandt; Jochem König; Christian Rainer Wirtz; Jan Coburger; Mirjam Renovanz
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Income and health-related quality of life among prostate cancer patients over a one-year period after radical prostatectomy: a linear mixed model analysis.

Authors:  Jens Klein; Daniel Lüdecke; Kerstin Hofreuter-Gätgens; Margit Fisch; Markus Graefen; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  One Versus Three Fractions of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Peripheral Stage I to II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Multi-Institution, Phase 2 Trial.

Authors:  Anurag K Singh; Jorge A Gomez-Suescun; Kevin L Stephans; Jeffrey A Bogart; Gregory M Hermann; Lili Tian; Adrienne Groman; Gregory M Videtic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A phase 1/2 study of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed or refractory AL amyloidosis.

Authors:  Vaishali Sanchorawala; Giovanni Palladini; Vishal Kukreti; Jeffrey A Zonder; Adam D Cohen; David C Seldin; Angela Dispenzieri; Arnaud Jaccard; Stefan O Schönland; Deborah Berg; Huyuan Yang; Neeraj Gupta; Ai-Min Hui; Raymond L Comenzo; Giampaolo Merlini
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Interpreting and Acting on PRO Results in Clinical Practice: Lessons Learned From the PatientViewpoint System and Beyond.

Authors:  Amanda L Blackford; Albert W Wu; Claire Snyder
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Exploring the impact of exercise and mind-body prehabilitation interventions on physical and psychological outcomes in women undergoing breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Robert Knoerl; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Timothy S Sannes; Anees B Chagpar; Deborah Dillon; Laura Stewart Dominici; Elizabeth S Frank; Mehra Golshan; Anne McTiernan; Esther Rhei; Sara M Tolaney; Eric P Winer; Rachel L Yung; Melinda L Irwin; Jennifer A Ligibel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Feasibility and outcomes of modified enhanced recovery after surgery for nursing management of aged patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Authors:  Wei Li; Bin Zheng; Shuliang Zhang; Hao Chen; Wei Zheng; Chun Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Health-Related Quality of Life and Treatment of Older Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology Review Paper.

Authors:  Kah Poh Loh; Maya Abdallah; Anita J Kumar; Nina R Neuendorff; Saurabh Dahiya; Heidi D Klepin
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.213

9.  Breast cancer survivors` recollection of their quality of life: Identifying determinants of recall bias in a longitudinal population-based trial.

Authors:  Patricia Lindberg; Petra Netter; Michael Koller; Brunhilde Steinger; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Thresholds for clinical importance for four key domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30: physical functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue and pain.

Authors:  Johannes M Giesinger; Wilma Kuijpers; Teresa Young; Krzysztof A Tomaszewski; Elizabeth Friend; August Zabernigg; Bernhard Holzner; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.