PURPOSE: This study aimed to (1) explore the needs of cancer patients regarding common nursing professional social support from the perspective of physicians and nurses, (2) identify what type of needs clinical nurses actually fulfill and what remains to be improved, and (3) analyze the potential reasons for the gap between the identified needs and those that are fulfilled. METHODS: A qualitative approach using focus group interviews was adopted to explore the perception and provision of cancer patients' needs regarding nursing professional social support. A purposive sample of 32 health care professionals was recruited from two teaching hospitals in Anhui province, China. Five focus group interviews were conducted and all interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A content analysis was performed with the data. RESULTS: The healthcare professionals perceived various nursing professional support needs of cancer patients; these include informational, emotional/psychological, and technical support needs; the mobilization of social resources; and palliative care during certain stages. The findings also indicated that there are still many unmet needs, especially needs related to the mobilization of social resources and palliative care. The reasons for the deficiencies in the fulfillment of these needs varied and included both subjective and objective aspects, such as the patients' lack of awareness of how to search for professional support, a shortage of professional staff, and the lack of a culturally appropriate assessment tool. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients' supportive care needs were not always fully provided by nurses, even when these needs were identified by healthcare professionals. Nursing professional social support needs should be assessed quickly and effectively so that the appropriate interventions can be offered to cancer patients.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to (1) explore the needs of cancerpatients regarding common nursing professional social support from the perspective of physicians and nurses, (2) identify what type of needs clinical nurses actually fulfill and what remains to be improved, and (3) analyze the potential reasons for the gap between the identified needs and those that are fulfilled. METHODS: A qualitative approach using focus group interviews was adopted to explore the perception and provision of cancerpatients' needs regarding nursing professional social support. A purposive sample of 32 health care professionals was recruited from two teaching hospitals in Anhui province, China. Five focus group interviews were conducted and all interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A content analysis was performed with the data. RESULTS: The healthcare professionals perceived various nursing professional support needs of cancerpatients; these include informational, emotional/psychological, and technical support needs; the mobilization of social resources; and palliative care during certain stages. The findings also indicated that there are still many unmet needs, especially needs related to the mobilization of social resources and palliative care. The reasons for the deficiencies in the fulfillment of these needs varied and included both subjective and objective aspects, such as the patients' lack of awareness of how to search for professional support, a shortage of professional staff, and the lack of a culturally appropriate assessment tool. CONCLUSIONS:Cancerpatients' supportive care needs were not always fully provided by nurses, even when these needs were identified by healthcare professionals. Nursing professional social support needs should be assessed quickly and effectively so that the appropriate interventions can be offered to cancerpatients.
Authors: E Wittmann; C Beaton; W G Lewis; A N Hopper; F Zamawi; C Jackson; B Dave; R Bowen; A Willacombe; G Blackshaw; T D L Crosby Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Sharon L Sanders; Erin O Bantum; Jason E Owen; Andrea A Thornton; Annette L Stanton Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Lei Jianyong; Yan Lunan; Wang Wentao; Zeng Yong; Li Bo; Wen Tianfu; Xu Minqing; Yang Jiaying Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Julia M Challinor; Annette L Galassi; Majeda A Al-Ruzzieh; Jean Bosco Bigirimana; Lori Buswell; Winnie K W So; Allison Burg Steinberg; Makeda Williams Journal: J Glob Oncol Date: 2016-02-03
Authors: Roy Rillera Marzo; Sudip Bhattacharya; Soe Soe Aye; Shailesh Tripathi; Thein Win Naing; Maung Maung Soe; Ye Wint Kyaw; Cyril Deeben A L Richard Packiam; Donnington Chai Ping Ping; Puteri Maisarah Binti Zolpakar; Vethashini A P Selvakumar; Saidatur Raihan Binti Abdul Ali; Auni Fajriyah Binti Hasrudin; Joshua Sutikno Journal: J Public Health Res Date: 2022-05-16