Literature DB >> 17314078

The effectiveness of a fertility awareness based method to avoid pregnancy in relation to a couple's sexual behaviour during the fertile time: a prospective longitudinal study.

P Frank-Herrmann1, J Heil, C Gnoth, E Toledo, S Baur, C Pyper, E Jenetzky, T Strowitzki, G Freundl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of fertility awareness based (FAB) methods of family planning is critically reviewed. The objective was to investigate the efficacy and the acceptability of the symptothermal method (STM), an FAB method that uses two indicators of fertility, temperature and cervical secretions observation. This paper will recommend a more suitable approach to measure the efficacy.
METHODS: Since 1985, an ongoing prospective observational longitudinal cohort study has been conducted in Germany. Women are asked to submit their menstrual cycle charts that record daily basal body temperature, cervical secretion observations and sexual behaviour. A cohort of 900 women contributed 17,638 cycles that met the inclusion criteria for the effectiveness study. The overall rates of unintended pregnancies and dropout rates have been estimated with survival curves according to the Kaplan-Meier method. In order to estimate the true method effectiveness, the pregnancy rates have been calculated in relation to sexual behaviour using the 'perfect/imperfect-use' model of Trussell and Grummer-Strawn.
RESULTS: After 13 cycles, 1.8 per 100 women of the cohort experienced an unintended pregnancy; 9.2 per 100 women dropped out because of dissatisfaction with the method; the pregnancy rate was 0.6 per 100 women and per 13 cycles when there was no unprotected intercourse in the fertile time.
CONCLUSIONS: The STM is a highly effective family planning method, provided the appropriate guidelines are consistently adhered to.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17314078     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  32 in total

1.  Obstetrician-gynecologists' views on contraception and natural family planning: a national survey.

Authors:  Ryan E Lawrence; Kenneth A Rasinski; John D Yoon; Farr A Curlin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Improving the Knowledge and Attitude on 'Standard Days Method' of Family Planning Through a Promotional Program Among Indian Postgraduate Students.

Authors:  Philby Babu Menachery; Judith Angelitta Noronha; Sweety Fernanades
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-04-13

3.  Self-Monitoring of Fertility Hormones: A New Era for Natural Family Planning?

Authors:  Leonard Blackwell; Delwyn Cooke; Simon Brown
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-03-28

Review 4.  Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies.

Authors:  Amy O Tsui; Raegan McDonald-Mosley; Anne E Burke
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  An Ob-Gyn Takes a Second Look at Birth Control.

Authors:  Steven Braatz
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-09-19

6.  Natural Family Planning.

Authors:  Claudia Wiesner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 7.  Contraceptive methods and risk of HIV acquisition or female-to-male transmission.

Authors:  Lisa B Haddad; Chelsea B Polis; Anandi N Sheth; Jennifer Brown; Athena P Kourtis; Caroline King; Rana Chakraborty; Igho Ofotokun
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.071

8.  Couple Beads: An integrated method of natural family planning.

Authors:  George Mulcaire-Jones; Richard J Fehring; Megan Bradshaw; Karen Brower; Gonzaga Lubega; Paskazia Lubega
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2016-02

Review 9.  Contraceptive failure in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app.

Authors:  E Berglund Scherwitzl; O Lundberg; H Kopp Kallner; K Gemzell Danielsson; J Trussell; R Scherwitzl
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.