Literature DB >> 27833183

Couple Beads: An integrated method of natural family planning.

George Mulcaire-Jones1, Richard J Fehring2, Megan Bradshaw3, Karen Brower3, Gonzaga Lubega4, Paskazia Lubega4.   

Abstract

Various fertility indicators are used by natural family planning methods to identify the fertile and infertile phases of a woman's menstrual cycle: mucus observations, cycle-day probabilities, basal body temperature readings, and hormonal measures of LH and estrogen. Simplified NFP methods generally make use of a single fertility indicator such as cycle-day probabilities (Standard Days Method) or mucus observations (Billings Ovulation Method). The Couple Bead Method integrates the two simplest fertility indicators, cycle-day probabilities and mucus observations, expanding its applicability to all women, regardless of cycle regularity and length. In determining cycle-day probabilities, the Couple Bead Method relies on a new data set from ultrasound-derived determinants of gestational age that more directly define the day of conception and the fertile window. By using a visual-based system of inexpensive colored beads, the Couple Bead Method can be used by couples of all educational and income levels. Lay Summary: Natural family planning methods provide education in regard to the signs of a woman's body which indicate if she is possibly fertile or not. Two important signs are the day of her menstrual cycle and her observations of bleeding and cervical mucus or dryness. The Couple Bead Method teaches a couple how to observe these signs and chart them with a system of colored beads. The Couple Bead Method can be used by women with regular or irregular cycles. The bead sets are inexpensive and consist of a length of plastic cord, colored "pony beads" and safety pins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertility; Health; Marriage; NFP; Procreation; Reproduction; Sexuality

Year:  2016        PMID: 27833183      PMCID: PMC5102181          DOI: 10.1080/00243639.2015.1133018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  21 in total

1.  Cervical mucus secretions on the day of intercourse: an accurate marker of highly fertile days.

Authors:  Bruno Scarpa; David B Dunson; Bernardo Colombo
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Further analysis of contraceptive failure of the ovulation method.

Authors:  J Trussell; L Grummer-Strawn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Physicians need more education about natural family planning.

Authors:  Marguerite Duane; Robert Motley; Michael Manhart
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  Multicenter study of the Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM): I. Efficacy, duration, and implications for clinical application.

Authors:  M H Labbok; V Hight-Laukaran; A E Peterson; V Fletcher; H von Hertzen; P F Van Look
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Variability in the phases of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Richard J Fehring; Mary Schneider; Kathleen Raviele
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2006 May-Jun

6.  The timing of the "fertile window" in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study.

Authors:  A J Wilcox; D Dunson; D D Baird
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-18

7.  Randomized comparison of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning.

Authors:  Richard J Fehring; Mary Schneider; Kathleen Raviele; Dana Rodriguez; Jessica Pruszynski
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Efficacy of a new postpartum transition protocol for avoiding pregnancy.

Authors:  Thomas Bouchard; Richard J Fehring; Mary Schneider
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

9.  Comparison of Abstinence and Coital Frequency Between 2 Natural Methods of Family Planning.

Authors:  Richard J Fehring; Mary Schneider
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 10.  'Fertility Awareness-Based Methods' and subfertility: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Thijssen; A Meier; K Panis; W Ombelet
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.