Literature DB >> 17311178

Application of a finite element model of the brain to study traumatic brain injury mechanisms in the rat.

Haojie Mao1, Liying Zhang, King H Yang, Albert I King.   

Abstract

Complete validation of any finite element (FE) model of the human brain is very difficult due to the lack of adequate experimental data. However, more animal brain injury data, especially rat data, obtained under well-defined mechanical loading conditions, are available to advance the understanding of the mechanisms of traumatic brain injury. Unfortunately, internal response of the brain in these experimental studies could not be measured. The aim of this study was to develop a detailed FE model of the rat brain for the prediction of intracranial responses due to different impact scenarios. Model results were used to elucidate possible brain injury mechanisms. A FE model, consisting of more than 250,000 hexahedral elements with a typical element size of 100 to 300 microns, was developed to represent the brain of a rat. The model was first validated locally against peak brain deformation data obtained from nine unique dynamic cortical deformation (vacuum) tests. The model was then used to predict biomechanical responses within the brain due to controlled cortical impacts (CCI). A total of six different series of CCI studies, four with unilateral craniotomy and two with bilateral craniotomy, were simulated and the results were systematically analyzed, including strain, strain rate and pressure within the rat brain. In the four unilateral CCI studies, approximately 150 rats were subjected to velocities ranging from 2.25 to 4 m/s, and cortical deformations of 1, 2 or 3 mm, with impactor diameters of 2.5 or 5 mm. Moreover, the impact direction varied from lateral 23 degrees to vertical. For the bilateral craniotomy CCI studies, about 70 rats were injured at 4.7 or 6 m/s, with deformations of 1.5 or 2.5 mm and impactor diameters of 3 or 5 mm, and at an impact direction of about 23-30 degrees laterally. Simulation results indicate that intracranial strains best correlate with experimentally obtained injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17311178     DOI: 10.4271/2006-22-0022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J        ISSN: 1532-8546


  24 in total

1.  New mechanics of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Vladimir G Ivancevic
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2008-11-23       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Finite element analysis of controlled cortical impact-induced cell loss.

Authors:  Haojie Mao; Xin Jin; Liying Zhang; King H Yang; Takuji Igarashi; Linda J Noble-Haeusslein; Albert I King
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Validation performance comparison for finite element models of the human brain.

Authors:  Logan E Miller; Jillian E Urban; Joel D Stitzel
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  Why is CA3 more vulnerable than CA1 in experimental models of controlled cortical impact-induced brain injury?

Authors:  Haojie Mao; Benjamin S Elkin; Vinay V Genthikatti; Barclay Morrison; King H Yang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Group-wise evaluation and comparison of white matter fiber strain and maximum principal strain in sports-related concussion.

Authors:  Songbai Ji; Wei Zhao; James C Ford; Jonathan G Beckwith; Richard P Bolander; Richard M Greenwald; Laura A Flashman; Keith D Paulsen; Thomas W McAllister
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Rate of neurodegeneration in the mouse controlled cortical impact model is influenced by impactor tip shape: implications for mechanistic and therapeutic studies.

Authors:  Jennifer M Pleasant; Shaun W Carlson; Haojie Mao; Stephen W Scheff; King H Yang; Kathryn E Saatman
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Quantitative Analysis of Tissue Damage Evolution in Porcine Liver With Interrupted Mechanical Testing Under Tension, Compression, and Shear.

Authors:  Joseph Chen; Bryn Brazile; Raj Prabhu; Sourav S Patnaik; Robbin Bertucci; Hongjoo Rhee; M F Horstemeyer; Yi Hong; Lakiesha N Williams; Jun Liao
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Study of mild traumatic brain injuries using experiments and finite element modeling.

Authors:  Michael Lamy; Daniel Baumgartner; Remy Willinger; Narayan Yoganandan; Brian D Stemper
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2011

Review 9.  The mechanics of traumatic brain injury: a review of what we know and what we need to know for reducing its societal burden.

Authors:  David F Meaney; Barclay Morrison; Cameron Dale Bass
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 10.  Animal models of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ye Xiong; Asim Mahmood; Michael Chopp
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.