Literature DB >> 21341976

Rate of neurodegeneration in the mouse controlled cortical impact model is influenced by impactor tip shape: implications for mechanistic and therapeutic studies.

Jennifer M Pleasant1, Shaun W Carlson, Haojie Mao, Stephen W Scheff, King H Yang, Kathryn E Saatman.   

Abstract

Controlled cortical impact (CCI), one of the most common models of traumatic brain injury, is being increasingly used with mice for exploration of cell injury mechanisms and pre-clinical evaluation of therapeutic strategies. Although CCI brain injury was originally effected using an impactor with a rounded tip, the majority of studies with mouse CCI use a flat or beveled tip. Recent finite element modeling analyses demonstrate that tip geometry is a significant determinant of predicted cortical tissue strains in rat CCI, and that cell death is proportional to predicted tissue strains. In the current study, a three-dimensional finite element model of a C57BL/6J mouse brain predicted higher maximum principal strains during a simulated 1.0-mm, 3.5-m/s CCI injury with a flat tip when compared to a rounded tip. Consistent with this prediction, experimental CCI with a flat-tip impactor resulted in greater acute cortical hemorrhage and neuron loss in adult male C57BL/6J mice. The amount of neocortical tissue damage was equivalent for the two tip geometries at 9 days following injury, but the rate of neocortical neurodegeneration was markedly slower following CCI with a rounded-tip impactor, with damage reaching a plateau after 24?h as opposed to after 4?h for the flat tip. The flat-tip impactor was associated in general with more regional hippocampal neurodegeneration, especially at early time points such as 4?h. Impactor tip geometry did not have a notable effect on blood?brain barrier breakdown, traumatic axonal injury, or motor and cognitive dysfunction. Execution of CCI injury with a rounded-tip impactor is posited to provide a substantially enhanced temporal window for the study of cellular injury mechanisms and therapeutic intervention while maintaining critical aspects of the pathophysiological response to contusion brain injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21341976      PMCID: PMC3218388          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  63 in total

1.  Validation of a controlled cortical impact model of head injury in mice.

Authors:  H J Hannay; Z Feldman; P Phan; A Keyani; N Panwar; J C Goodman; C S Robertson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Regional distribution of fluoro-jade B staining in the hippocampus following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kevin J Anderson; Kelly M Miller; Isabella Fugaccia; Stephen W Scheff
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  A three-dimensional digital atlas database of the adult C57BL/6J mouse brain by magnetic resonance microscopy.

Authors:  Y Ma; P R Hof; S C Grant; S J Blackband; R Bennett; L Slatest; M D McGuigan; H Benveniste
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Differential behavioral and histopathological responses to graded cortical impact injury in mice.

Authors:  Kathryn E Saatman; Kristofer J Feeko; Rebecca L Pape; Ramesh Raghupathi
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy? A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations

Authors: 
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Age-dependent changes in material properties of the brain and braincase of the rat.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Nurit Gefen; Qiliang Zhu; Ramesh Raghupathi; Susan S Margulies
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Axial mechanical properties of fresh human cerebral blood vessels.

Authors:  Kenneth L Monson; Werner Goldsmith; Nicholas M Barbaro; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Necrostatin-1 reduces histopathology and improves functional outcome after controlled cortical impact in mice.

Authors:  Zerong You; Sean I Savitz; Jinsheng Yang; Alexei Degterev; Junying Yuan; Gregory D Cuny; Michael A Moskowitz; Michael J Whalen
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Hippocampal vulnerability following traumatic brain injury: a potential role for neurotrophin-4/5 in pyramidal cell neuroprotection.

Authors:  N C Royo; V Conte; K E Saatman; S Shimizu; C M Belfield; K M Soltesz; J E Davis; S T Fujimoto; T K McIntosh
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  A model of parasagittal controlled cortical impact in the mouse: cognitive and histopathologic effects.

Authors:  D H Smith; H D Soares; J S Pierce; K G Perlman; K E Saatman; D F Meaney; C E Dixon; T K McIntosh
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.269

View more
  37 in total

1.  Acute Post-Traumatic Sleep May Define Vulnerability to a Second Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice.

Authors:  Rachel K Rowe; Jordan L Harrison; Helena W Morrison; Vignesh Subbian; Sean M Murphy; Jonathan Lifshitz
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Acute over-the-counter pharmacological intervention does not adversely affect behavioral outcome following diffuse traumatic brain injury in the mouse.

Authors:  Jordan L Harrison; Rachel K Rowe; Bruce F O'Hara; P David Adelson; Jonathan Lifshitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hyperfibrinogenemia-mediated astrocyte activation.

Authors:  Vincent D Clark; Ailey Layson; Mariam Charkviani; Nino Muradashvili; David Lominadze
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Rit GTPase signaling promotes immature hippocampal neuronal survival.

Authors:  Weikang Cai; Shaun W Carlson; Jennifer M Brelsfoard; Catherine E Mannon; Carole L Moncman; Kathryn E Saatman; Douglas A Andres
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Why is CA3 more vulnerable than CA1 in experimental models of controlled cortical impact-induced brain injury?

Authors:  Haojie Mao; Benjamin S Elkin; Vinay V Genthikatti; Barclay Morrison; King H Yang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Changes in NG2 cells and oligodendrocytes in a new model of intraspinal hemorrhage.

Authors:  F Rezan Sahinkaya; Lindsay M Milich; Dana M McTigue
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Fibrinogen-cellular prion protein complex formation on astrocytes.

Authors:  Mariam Charkviani; Nino Muradashvili; Nurul Sulimai; David Lominadze
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Selective vulnerability of hippocampal interneurons to graded traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jan C Frankowski; Young J Kim; Robert F Hunt
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 5.996

9.  Ablation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene decreases cerebrovascular permeability and fibrinogen deposition post traumatic brain injury in mice.

Authors:  Nino Muradashvili; Richard L Benton; Kathryn E Saatman; Suresh C Tyagi; David Lominadze
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 10.  The Controlled Cortical Impact Model of Experimental Brain Trauma: Overview, Research Applications, and Protocol.

Authors:  Nicole Osier; C Edward Dixon
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.