Literature DB >> 23557208

Why is CA3 more vulnerable than CA1 in experimental models of controlled cortical impact-induced brain injury?

Haojie Mao1, Benjamin S Elkin, Vinay V Genthikatti, Barclay Morrison, King H Yang.   

Abstract

One interesting finding of controlled cortical impact (CCI) experiments is that the CA3 region of the hippocampus, which is positioned further from the impact than the CA1 region, is reported as being more injured. The current literature has suggested a positive correlation between brain tissue stretch and neuronal cell loss. However, it is counterintuitive to assume that CA3 is stretched more during CCI injury. Recent mechanical studies of the brain have reported on a level of spatial heterogeneity not previously appreciated-the finding that CA1 was significantly stiffer than all other regions tested and that CA3 was one of the most compliant. We hypothesized that mechanical heterogeneity of anatomical structures could underlie the proposed heterogeneous mechanical response and hence the pattern of cell death. As such, we developed a three-dimensional finite element (FE) rat brain model representing detailed hippocampal structures and simulated various CCI experiments. Four groups of material properties based on recent experiments were tested. In group 1, hyperelastic material properties were assigned to various hippocampal structures, with CA3 more compliant than CA1. In group 2, linear viscoelastic material properties were assigned to hippocampal structures, with CA3 more compliant than CA1. In group 3, the hippocampus was represented by homogenous linear viscoelastic material properties. In group 4, a homogeneous nonlinear hippocampus was adopted. Simulation results demonstrated that for CCI with a 5-mm diameter, flat shape impactor, CA3 experienced increased tensile strains over a larger area and to a greater magnitude than did CA1 for group 1, which best explained why CA3 is more sensitive to CCI injury. However, for groups 2-4, the total volume with high strain (>30%) in CA3 was smaller than that in CA1. The FE rat brain model, with detailed hippocampal structures presented here, will help to engineer desired experimental neurotrauma models by virtually characterizing brain biomechanics before testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23557208      PMCID: PMC3751323          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  23 in total

1.  An in vitro model of neural trauma: device characterization and calcium response to mechanical stretch.

Authors:  D M Geddes; R S Cargill
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Regional distribution of fluoro-jade B staining in the hippocampus following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kevin J Anderson; Kelly M Miller; Isabella Fugaccia; Stephen W Scheff
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Mechanical characterization of an in vitro device designed to quantitatively injure living brain tissue.

Authors:  B Morrison; D F Meaney; T K McIntosh
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Rate of neurodegeneration in the mouse controlled cortical impact model is influenced by impactor tip shape: implications for mechanistic and therapeutic studies.

Authors:  Jennifer M Pleasant; Shaun W Carlson; Haojie Mao; Stephen W Scheff; King H Yang; Kathryn E Saatman
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Computational studies of strain exposures in neonate and mature rat brains during closed head impact.

Authors:  Anna Levchakov; Eran Linder-Ganz; Ramesh Raghupathi; Susan S Margulies; Amit Gefen
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Protective effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor on hippocampal neurons after traumatic brain injury in rats.

Authors:  B T Kim; V L Rao; K A Sailor; K K Bowen; R J Dempsey
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Delayed, selective neuronal death following experimental cortical impact injury in rats: possible role in memory deficits.

Authors:  M A Colicos; C E Dixon; P K Dash
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1996-11-11       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Mechanical heterogeneity of the rat hippocampus measured by atomic force microscope indentation.

Authors:  Benjamin S Elkin; Evren U Azeloglu; Kevin D Costa; Barclay Morrison
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Neuronal and glial cell number in the hippocampus after experimental traumatic brain injury: analysis by stereological estimation.

Authors:  M Sean Grady; Jay S Charleston; Don Maris; Brent M Witgen; Jonathan Lifshitz
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Experimentally validated three-dimensional finite element model of the rat for mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Michael Lamy; Daniel Baumgartner; Narayan Yoganandan; Brian D Stemper; Rémy Willinger
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.602

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical simulation of traumatic brain injury in the rat.

Authors:  John D Finan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  AIM2 inflammasome mediates hallmark neuropathological alterations and cognitive impairment in a mouse model of vascular dementia.

Authors:  Luting Poh; David Y Fann; Peiyan Wong; Hong Meng Lim; Sok Lin Foo; Sung-Wook Kang; Vismitha Rajeev; Sharmelee Selvaraji; Vinaya Rajagopal Iyer; Nageiswari Parathy; Mohammad Badruzzaman Khan; David C Hess; Dong-Gyu Jo; Grant R Drummond; Christopher G Sobey; Mitchell K P Lai; Christopher Li-Hsian Chen; Lina H K Lim; Thiruma V Arumugam
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 15.992

3.  Traumatic brain injury alters long-term hippocampal neuron morphology in juvenile, but not immature, rats.

Authors:  Eric M Casella; Theresa Currier Thomas; Dana L Vanino; Wendy Fellows-Mayle; Jonathan Lifshitz; J Patrick Card; P David Adelson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Effect of Fluoxetine on the Hippocampus of Wistar Albino Rats in Cold Restraint Stress Model.

Authors:  Saikarthik Jayakumar; Gunapriya Raghunath; Saraswathi Ilango; J Vijayakumar; R Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  Regional variations in stiffness in live mouse brain tissue determined by depth-controlled indentation mapping.

Authors:  Nelda Antonovaite; Steven V Beekmans; Elly M Hol; Wytse J Wadman; Davide Iannuzzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Folic acid deficiency enhanced microglial immune response via the Notch1/nuclear factor kappa B p65 pathway in hippocampus following rat brain I/R injury and BV2 cells.

Authors:  Man Cheng; Liu Yang; Zhiping Dong; Mengying Wang; Yan Sun; Huan Liu; Xuan Wang; Na Sai; Guowei Huang; Xumei Zhang
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 5.310

7.  A method for assessing tissue respiration in anatomically defined brain regions.

Authors:  Erica Underwood; John B Redell; Jing Zhao; Anthony N Moore; Pramod K Dash
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Neurodegeneration exposes firing rate dependent effects on oscillation dynamics in computational neural networks.

Authors:  David Gabrieli; Samantha N Schumm; Nicholas F Vigilante; Brandon Parvesse; David F Meaney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.