Literature DB >> 23788721

Stage IB1 cervical cancer: role of preoperative MR imaging in selection of patients for fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy.

Yulia Lakhman1, Oguz Akin, Kay J Park, Debra M Sarasohn, Junting Zheng, Debra A Goldman, Michael J Sohn, Chaya S Moskowitz, Yukio Sonoda, Hedvig Hricak, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether magnetic resonance (MR) imaging evaluation of key morphologic tumor characteristics can improve patient selection for radical trachelectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved and waived informed consent for this study of 62 patients (mean age, 32 years; age range, 23-42 years) with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB1 cervical carcinoma who underwent attempted radical trachelectomy between November 2001 and January 2011 and had preoperative MR imaging. Retrospectively, two radiologists reviewed MR images for tumor presence and size, distance between tumor and internal os, and presence of deep cervical stromal invasion. Associations between MR imaging findings and surgery type were tested.
RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of tumor detection were, respectively, 87% and 100% (reader 1) and 76% and 95% (reader 2). Six of six patients with negative cone biopsy margins and no tumor at postconization MR imaging were without tumor at trachelectomy pathologic analysis. Mean differences between MR imaging and histologic tumor sizes were 0.7 mm (range, -15 to 11 mm) for reader 1 and 2.2 mm (range, -9 to 15 mm) for reader 2. Sensitivities for deep cervical stromal invasion were 75% (reader 1) and 50% (reader 2). For each reader, nine of nine (100%) patients with tumor 5 mm or less from the internal os and three of five (60%) patients with tumor 6-9 mm from the internal os at MR imaging needed radical hysterectomy. For both readers, tumor size of 2 cm or larger (P < .001) and deep cervical stromal invasion (P ≤ .003) at MR imaging were associated with increased chance of radical hysterectomy.
CONCLUSION: Pretrachelectomy MR imaging can help identify high-risk patients likely to need radical hysterectomy or confirm the absence of residual tumor in the cervix after a cone biopsy with negative margins. © RSNA, 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23788721      PMCID: PMC6822769          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  36 in total

1.  Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: indications and applications.

Authors:  Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Yukio Sonoda
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Pregnancy after radical vaginal trachelectomy: maybe not such a risky undertaking after all.

Authors:  Lynda D Roman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Radical vaginal trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer-cumulative pregnancy rate in a series of 123 women.

Authors:  J H Shepherd; C Spencer; J Herod; T E J Ind
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Cervical cancer incidence in a prevaccine era in the United States, 1998-2002.

Authors:  Mona Saraiya; Faruque Ahmed; Sheila Krishnan; Thomas B Richards; Elizabeth R Unger; Herschel W Lawson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.

Authors:  Donald G Mitchell; Bradley Snyder; Fergus Coakley; Caroline Reinhold; Gillian Thomas; Marco Amendola; Lawrence H Schwartz; Paula Woodward; Harpreet Pannu; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings.

Authors:  H Hricak; C G Lacey; L G Sandles; Y C Chang; M L Winkler; J L Stern
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Annual summary of vital statistics: 2008.

Authors:  T J Mathews; Arialdi M Miniño; Michelle J K Osterman; Donna M Strobino; Bernard Guyer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lukas Rob; Petr Skapa; Helena Robova
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness.

Authors:  S Sironi; F De Cobelli; G Scarfone; E Colombo; G Bolis; A Ferrari; A DelMaschio
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  John P Diaz; Yukio Sonoda; Mario M Leitao; Oliver Zivanovic; Carol L Brown; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  15 in total

1.  Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018.

Authors:  Lucia Manganaro; Yulia Lakhman; Nishat Bharwani; Benedetta Gui; Silvia Gigli; Valeria Vinci; Stefania Rizzo; Aki Kido; Teresa Margarida Cunha; Evis Sala; Andrea Rockall; Rosemarie Forstner; Stephanie Nougaret
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: How MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management.

Authors:  Sinead H McEvoy; Stephanie Nougaret; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Christine O Menias; Fuki Shitano; Shinya Fujii; Ramon E Sosa; Joanna G Escalon; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-10

3.  Is MRI helpful in assessing the distance of the tumour from the internal os in patients with cervical cancer below FIGO Stage IB2?

Authors:  P R Bhosale; R B Iyer; P Ramalingam; K M Schmeler; W Wei; R L Bassett; P T Ramirez; M Frumovitz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 4.  Current imaging strategies for the evaluation of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Charis Bourgioti; Konstantinos Chatoupis; Lia Angela Moulopoulos
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

5.  Progress in surgical oncology: Gynecology perspective.

Authors:  Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 2.885

6.  What MRI-based tumor size measurement is best for predicting long-term survival in uterine cervical cancer?

Authors:  Njål Lura; Kari S Wagner-Larsen; David Forsse; Jone Trovik; Mari K Halle; Bjørn I Bertelsen; Øyvind Salvesen; Kathrine Woie; Camilla Krakstad; Ingfrid S Haldorsen
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-06-17

7.  Second-Opinion Interpretations of Gynecologic Oncologic MRI Examinations by Sub-Specialized Radiologists Influence Patient Care.

Authors:  Yulia Lakhman; Melvin D'Anastasi; Maura Miccò; Chiara Scelzo; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Stephanie Nougaret; Ramon E Sosa; Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hedvig Hricak; Evis Sala
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Aki Kido; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Identifying a low-risk group for parametrial involvement in microscopic Stage IB1 cervical cancer using criteria from ongoing studies and a new MRI criterion.

Authors:  Jung-Yun Lee; Jina Youm; Jae-Weon Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Min A Kim; Tae Hun Kim; Dong Hoon Suh; Myong Cheol Lim; Noh Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Preoperative imaging in patients undergoing trachelectomy for cervical cancer: validation of a combined T2- and diffusion-weighted endovaginal MRI technique at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Katherine Downey; John H Shepherd; Ayoma D Attygalle; Steve Hazell; Veronica A Morgan; Sharon L Giles; Thomas E J Ind; Nandita M Desouza
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.