Literature DB >> 21688026

[Uterine cervical cancer : preoperative staging with magnetic resonance imaging].

F Collettini1, B Hamm.   

Abstract

The treatment of uterine cervical carcinoma is largely dependent on the tumor stage. Despite significant inaccuracies in the clinical examination, uterine cervical cancer remains the only gynecological form of cancer still largely staged according to clinical findings. Although imaging is still not included in the staging the recently published revised FIGO (Fédération International de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique) system encourages the use of modern cross-sectional imaging (magnetic resonance imaging MRI and computed tomography CT). Due to its high soft tissue contrast MRI allows excellent non-invasive assessment of the cervix with direct tumor delineation as well as assessment of the prognosis based on morphological factors. Studies in the literature report an accuracy of 93% for MRI in the preoperative assessment of tumor size and in the differentiation of operable from advanced cervical cancer. Therefore MRI is considered to be the optimal modality for diagnostic evaluation starting from FIGO stage IB1, for radiation therapy planning, and for exclusion of recurrence in follow-up. In this paper we give an overview of the role of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of uterine cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21688026     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-010-2119-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  30 in total

1.  Correlations between dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived measures of tumor microvasculature and interstitial fluid pressure in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Masoom A Haider; Igor Sitartchouk; Timothy P L Roberts; Anthony Fyles; Ali T Hashmi; Michael Milosevic
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Comparison of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of stage Ib carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  H Hricak; K K Yu; C B Powell; L L Subak; J Stem; R L Arenson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings.

Authors:  H Hricak; C G Lacey; L G Sandles; Y C Chang; M L Winkler; J L Stern
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience.

Authors:  A Sahdev; S A Sohaib; A E T Wenaden; J H Shepherd; R H Reznek
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Fast dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  P B Van Vierzen; L F Massuger; S H Ruys; J O Barentsz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Staging, volume estimation and assessment of nodal status in carcinoma of the cervix: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings.

Authors:  J M Hawnaur; R J Johnson; C H Buckley; V Tindall; I Isherwood
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 7.  [Pretreatment diagnostic evaluation of cervical cancer].

Authors:  U Lemke; B Hamm
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2009-04-16

8.  Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging.

Authors:  K Togashi; K Nishimura; T Sagoh; S Minami; S Noma; I Fujisawa; Y Nakano; J Konishi; H Ozasa; I Konishi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Imaging in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Michele Follen; Charles F Levenback; Revathy B Iyer; Perry W Grigsby; Erik A Boss; Ebrahim S Delpassand; Bruno D Fornage; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Stage IB cervical carcinoma: comparison of clinical, MR, and pathologic staging.

Authors:  D Rubens; J R Thornbury; C Angel; M H Stoler; S L Weiss; R M Lerner; J Beecham
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison between readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of cervical cancer staging.

Authors:  Weiliang Qian; Qian Chen; Zhongshuai Zhang; Hong Wang; Jibin Zhang; Jianming Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Uterine cervical malignancy: diagnostic accuracy of MRI with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Mohammed A Shweel; Enas A Abdel-Gawad; Ehab Ali Abdel-Gawad; Hosny S Abdelghany; Alshimaa M Abdel-Rahman; Emad M Ibrahim
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2012-07-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.