Literature DB >> 12939211

Rapid left-to-right shunt quantification in children by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging combined with sensitivity encoding (SENSE).

Philipp Beerbaum1, Hermann Körperich, Jürgen Gieseke, Peter Barth, Matthias Peuster, Hans Meyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parallel imaging by sensitivity encoding (SENSE) may considerably reduce scan time in MRI. For rapid flow quantification in children with congenital heart disease, we evaluated phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) techniques combined with SENSE. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 22 pediatric patients (mean age, 7.2+/-6.2 years) with cardiac left-to-right shunt, blood flow rate in the pulmonary artery (Qp) and ascending aorta (Qs) and flow ratio Qp/Qs were determined by PC-MRI with SENSE reduction-factor 2 and 3 (SF-2 and SF-3). Additionally, we used PC-MRI with higher spatial in-plane resolution (1.6x2.1 versus 2.3x3.1 mm) with and without SF-3. Results were compared with a recently validated standard PC-MRI protocol and tested in vitro using a pulsatile flow phantom. Reduction of signal averages from 2 to 1 and application of SENSE accelerated flow measurements by a factor of 3.5 (5.2) using PC-MRI with SF-2 (SF-3) compared with standard PC-MRI. For blood flow rate through the pulmonary artery and aorta, as well as for the Qp/Qs ratio we found negligible differences of +/-3%, lower limits of agreement (mean+/-2 SD) of -7% to -18%, and upper limits of agreement (mean+/-2 SD) of +3 to +24%, demonstrating good agreement with standard PC-MRI. Mean Qp/Qs ratio by standard PC-MRI was 1.69+/-0.45 (range, 1.27 to 2.79). Interobserver variability was low, and high accuracy was confirmed in vitro for all protocols.
CONCLUSIONS: PC-MRI for flow quantitation may be combined with SENSE to achieve a substantive reduction of scanning time. In children with left-to-right shunt, Qp/Qs quantification is possible by PC-MRI+SF-3 in <60 seconds. Use of higher in-plane resolution did not improve measurement results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12939211     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087603.97036.C2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  30 in total

1.  4D phase-contrast flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comprehensive quantification and visualization of flow dynamics in atrial septal defect and partial anomalous pulmonary venous return.

Authors:  Israel Valverde; John Simpson; Tobias Schaeffter; Philipp Beerbaum
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Evaluation of intracardiac shunts with cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Patrick M Colletti
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Quantitative MRI comparison of pulmonary hemodynamics in mustard/senning-repaired patients suffering from transposition of the great arteries and healthy volunteers at rest.

Authors:  Eric Laffon; Valérie Latrabe; Maria Jimenez; Dominique Ducassou; François Laurent; Roger Marthan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI.

Authors:  Peter D Gatehouse; Jennifer Keegan; Lindsey A Crowe; Sharmeen Masood; Raad H Mohiaddin; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; David N Firmin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging guided catheterisation for assessment of pulmonary vascular resistance: in vivo validation and clinical application in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  T Kuehne; S Yilmaz; I Schulze-Neick; E Wellnhofer; P Ewert; E Nagel; P Lange
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Assessment of shunt volumes in children with ventricular septal defects: comparative quantification of MR flow measurements and invasive oximetry.

Authors:  Anoosh Esmaeili; Rene Höhn; Arne Koch; Thomas Josef Vogl; Roland Hofstetter; Nasreddin Abolmaali
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Peak velocity and flow quantification validation for sensitivity-encoded phase-contrast MR imaging.

Authors:  Calvin D Lew; Marcus T Alley; Roland Bammer; Daniel M Spielman; Frandics P Chan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Atrial septal defects type II: noninvasive evaluation of patients before implantation of an Amplatzer Septal Occluder and on follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging compared with TEE and invasive measurement.

Authors:  Christoph Weber; Michael Weber; Okan Ekinci; Thomas Neumann; Anja Deetjen; Andreas Rolf; Gerhard Adam; Christian W Hamm; Thorsten Dill
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.