Literature DB >> 17296378

Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Bradford Nelson1, Melissa Kaufman, Gregory Broughton, Michael S Cookson, Sam S Chang, S Duke Herrell, Roxelyn G Baumgartner, Joseph A Smith.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive surgery has been shown to decrease postoperative morbidity and length of stay for a number of surgical procedures. Furthermore, length of stay after open radical prostatectomy has decreased dramatically during the last decade. We examined differences in length of stay between a prospectively evaluated cohort of patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2003 and March 2006, 1,003 radical prostatectomies were performed at our hospital. Data were collected in prospective fashion and a comparison was made between 374 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and 629 who underwent robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Length of stay, factors influencing length of stay, readmission rates and unscheduled clinic or emergency room visits were evaluated. Patients in the 2 groups were treated using the same clinical care pathway.
RESULTS: Overall 94.3% of patients in the radical retropubic prostatectomy group and 97.5% in the robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy group were discharged home on or before postoperative day 1. Mean length of stay in the radical retropubic and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy groups was 1.25 (median 1.09) and 1.17 days (median 1.03), which was similar and not statistically different (p=0.27). Readmission rates were similar in robot assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy patients (7% and 5%, respectively, p=0.12). Unscheduled clinic or emergency room visits were the same in the robot assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy groups (10%, p=0.95).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy or robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy can be treated on the same clinical pathway. A targeted hospital discharge date of postoperative day 1 can be achieved in the majority of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Readmission rates or unscheduled hospital visits are necessary in a small percent of patients treated with an early discharge program, of which the majority are caused by ileus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17296378     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  44 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based comparison of robotic and open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Tatum V Tarin; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2010-11-16

2.  [Robotic surgery in urology].

Authors:  S Buse; C Gilfrich; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  New findings in bladder and prostate cancer: highlights of the 22nd annual congress of the European association of urology, march 21-24, 2007, berlin, Germany.

Authors:  Maximilian Rom; Franklin E Kuehhas; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

Review 4.  Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Benjamin J Challacombe; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in Greece: the learning curve and beyond. The initial 40 cases.

Authors:  N P Pardalidis; N A Andriopoulos; A Tsiga; N Giannakou; E Kosmaoglou
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-06-17

6.  Predicting length of stay after robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Wassim M Bazzi; Daniel D Sjoberg; Angelica A C Grasso; Melanie Bernstein; Raul Parra; Jonathan A Coleman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Arguments against investing widely in robotic prostatectomy in Canada: a wrong focus on tool box rather than surgical expertise.

Authors:  Yves Fradet
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Status of radical prostatectomy in 2009: is there medical evidence to justify the robotic approach?

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: analysis of an experienced open surgeon's learning curve after 300 procedures.

Authors:  Nicolas Doumerc; Carlo Yuen; Richard Savdie; Md Bayzidur Rahman; Ruth Pe Benito; Phillip Stricker
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-01-22

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience with first 112 cases.

Authors:  Ali Ihsan Tasci; Alper Bitkin; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey; Volkan Tugcu; Erkan Sonmezay
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.