Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Arguments against investing widely in robotic prostatectomy in Canada: a wrong focus on tool box rather than surgical expertise.

Literature DB >> 20019979

Arguments against investing widely in robotic prostatectomy in Canada: a wrong focus on tool box rather than surgical expertise.

Yves Fradet¹.

Abstract

Year: 2009 PMID： 20019979 PMCID： PMC2792425 DOI： 10.5489/cuaj.1181

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can Urol Assoc J ISSN： 1911-6470 Impact factor: 1.862

× No keyword cloud information.

17 in total

1. Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters.

Authors: Fernando J Bianco; Elyn R Riedel; Colin B Begg; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 7.450

2. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve?

Authors: S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith
Journal: Urology Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.649

3. Self-reported volume of radical prostatectomies among urologists in the USA.

Authors: Thomas D Denberg; Robert C Flanigan; Fernando J Kim; Richard M Hoffman; John F Steiner
Journal: BJU Int Date: 2006-11-28 Impact factor: 5.588

4. Robotic surgery--squeezing into tight places.

Authors: Norman T Berlinger
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-05-18 Impact factor: 91.245

5. Short-term health outcome differences between robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy.

Authors: David P Wood; Ryan Schulte; Rodney L Dunn; Brent K Hollenbeck; Richard Saur; J Stuart Wolf; James E Montie
Journal: Urology Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 2.649

6. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: ten years later, time for evidence-based foundation.

Authors: Scott E Eggener; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-03-05 Impact factor: 20.096

7. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors: Bradford Nelson; Melissa Kaufman; Gregory Broughton; Michael S Cookson; Sam S Chang; S Duke Herrell; Roxelyn G Baumgartner; Joseph A Smith
Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 7.450

Arguments against investing widely in robotic prostatectomy in Canada: a wrong focus on tool box rather than surgical expertise.

1. Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters.

2. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve?

3. Self-reported volume of radical prostatectomies among urologists in the USA.

4. Robotic surgery--squeezing into tight places.

5. Short-term health outcome differences between robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy.

6. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: ten years later, time for evidence-based foundation.

7. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

8. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

9. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy.

10. Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes.

1. The training of Canadian urology residents: Whither open surgery?

2. Practice makes progress: Assessing our robotic skills.