Literature DB >> 26156732

Predicting length of stay after robotic partial nephrectomy.

Wassim M Bazzi1, Daniel D Sjoberg, Angelica A C Grasso, Melanie Bernstein, Raul Parra, Jonathan A Coleman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To investigate factors predictive of length of stay (LOS) after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in an effort to identify patients suitable for RPN with overnight stay at outpatient surgical facilities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent RPN at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from January 2007 to July 2012 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the main predictors of LOS. The discrimination of the multivariate model was measured using the area under the curve (AUC); tenfold cross-validation was performed to correct for over-fit.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-six patients were included in the analysis; 84 (45 %) had LOS of ≤1 day (median LOS 2 day; interquartile range 1-2). On univariate analysis, preoperative variables associated with LOS > 1 included larger tumors (P < 0.0001), lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.003), older age (P = 0.006), female gender (P = 0.035), and higher comorbidity score (P = 0.015); operative variables associated with LOS > 1 day included greater estimated blood loss (P < 0.0001) and longer operative (P < 0.0001) and ischemia (P < 0.0001) times. The AUC of the preoperative model was 0.61 (95 % CI 0.52-0.69) after tenfold cross-validation.
CONCLUSIONS: LOS after RPN is influenced by age, gender, medical comorbidities, and tumor size. However, when analyzed retrospectively, these factors had limited ability to predict LOS after RPN with sufficient accuracy to develop a prediction tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26156732      PMCID: PMC4538957          DOI: 10.1007/s11255-015-1044-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  29 in total

1.  From the operating room to the office: paradigm shift in the economics of surgical practice.

Authors:  Neil Baum
Journal:  J Med Pract Manage       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

2.  RENAL nephrometry score is associated with operative approach for partial nephrectomy and urine leak.

Authors:  Sean P Stroup; Kerrin Palazzi; Ryan P Kopp; Reza Mehrazin; Michael Santomauro; Seth A Cohen; Anthony L Patterson; James O L'Esperance; Ithaar H Derweesh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience.

Authors:  Brian M Benway; Sam B Bhayani; Craig G Rogers; James R Porter; Nicolò M Buffi; Robert S Figenshau; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs.

Authors:  Thomas Rotter; Leigh Kinsman; Erica James; Andreas Machotta; Holger Gothe; Jon Willis; Pamela Snow; Joachim Kugler
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-03-17

5.  The effect of gender on nephrectomy perioperative outcomes: a national survey.

Authors:  Jesse Sammon; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Maxine Sun; Marco Bianchi; Jan Schmitges; Shahrokh F Shariat; Khurshid R Ghani; Shyam Sukumar; Claudio Jeldres; Alberto Briganti; Paul Perrotte; Craig G Rogers; James O Peabody; Francesco Montorsi; Mani Menon; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.344

6.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute; George K Chow; Richard Neururer; Georg Bartsch; Reinhard Peschel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Interobserver reliability of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system.

Authors:  Surendra B Kolla; Philippe E Spiess; Wade J Sexton
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: step-by-step contemporary technique and surgical outcomes at a single high-volume institution.

Authors:  Jihad H Kaouk; Ali Khalifeh; Shahab Hillyer; Georges-Pascal Haber; Robert J Stein; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006.

Authors:  Karen A Cullen; Margaret J Hall; Aleksandr Golosinskiy
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2009-01-28

10.  Surgical quality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing outpatient urological surgery.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; Chris S Saigal; Julie C Lai; Rodney L Dunn; Seth A Strope; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Non-modifiable factors predict discharge quality after robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Matthew J Maurice; Daniel Ramirez; Önder Kara; Ryan J Nelson; Peter A Caputo; Ercan Malkoç; Jihad H Kaouk
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography (CEUS) in the Assessment of Kidney Wound Recovery After Nephron-Sparing Surgery.

Authors:  Di Niu; Liang Li; Hexi Du; Haoqiang Shi; Jun Zhou; Sheng Tai; Hanjiang Xu; Wei Chen; Cheng Yang; Chaozhao Liang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  The R.E.N.A.L score's relevance in determining perioperative and oncological outcomes: a Middle-Eastern tertiary care center experience.

Authors:  Nassib Abou Heidar; Nizar Hakam; Jose M El-Asmar; Jad Najdi; Mark A Khauli; Jad Degheili; Albert El-Hajj; Rami Nasr; Wassim Wazzan; Muhammad Bulbul; Deborah Mukherji; Raja Khauli
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2022-04-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.