Literature DB >> 17294071

Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy.

Séverine Alran1, Yann De Rycke, Virginie Fourchotte, Hélène Charitansky, Fatima Laki, Marie Christine Falcou, Myriam Benamor, Paul Freneaux, Rémy Jacques Salmon, Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) is currently under discussion in the literature. The breast cancer nomogram (BCN), an online tool developed by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), aims to predict the risk of positive non-SLN in SLN-positive patients. The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of the nomogram on patients with macrometastatic and micrometastatic SLN-positive biopsy findings.
METHODS: Patient characteristics, tumor pathology, and positive SLN characteristics were collected on 588 consecutive patients who underwent completion ALND. The MSKCC BCN tool was used to calculate risk of metastases for all 588 cases that included a subgroup of the 213 patients with SLN micrometastases. The BCN was performed for positive SLN biopsy findings regardless of the method of metastasis detection. Evaluation of the BCN was performed by the area under the curve method.
RESULTS: The BCN applied to all 588 patients achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of .724 (range, .677-.771) compared with .76 in the MSKCC study. When the tool was applied solely to micrometastases found by hematoxylin and eosin staining and metastases found by immunohistochemistry, the area under the ROC was .538 (range, .423-.653).
CONCLUSIONS: The MSKCC nomogram has been validated for all the patients having a metastatic SLN at the Institut Curie. However, this model was not reliably predictive for positive non-SLN in cases with micrometastic positive SLN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17294071     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9331-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  25 in total

1.  Incorporation of sentinel lymph node metastasis size into a nomogram predicting nonsentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Kelly K Hunt; Judy C Boughey; Roland Bassett; Amy C Degnim; Robyn Harrell; Min Yi; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; Gildy V Babiera; Henry M Kuerer; Rosa F Hwang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Nomogram to predict the risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Japanese breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Tatsunari Sasada; Shigeru Murakami; Tsuyoshi Kataoka; Masahiro Ohara; Shinji Ozaki; Morihito Okada; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Validation of online calculators to predict the non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Satoru Tanaka; Nayuko Sato; Hiroya Fujioka; Yuko Takahashi; Kosei Kimura; Mitsuhiko Iwamoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Minimal disease in sentinel nodes.

Authors:  Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Risk factors and a predictive nomogram for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in Chinese breast cancer patients with one or two sentinel lymph node macrometastases and mastectomy.

Authors:  X Y Wang; J T Wang; T Guo; X Y Kong; L Chen; J Zhai; Y Q Gao; Y Fang; J Wang
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Evaluation of the Probability of Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis using Two Different Methods.

Authors:  İrfan Başoğlu; Muhammet Ferhat Çelik; Ahmet Cem Dural; Mustafa Gökhan Ünsal; Cevher Akarsu; Halil Fırat Baytekin; Selin Kapan; Halil Alış
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-10-01

7.  Comparison of two models for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastases in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Giovanni D'Eredita'; Vito Leopoldo Troilo; Fernando Fischetti; Giuseppe Rubini; Tommaso Berardi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-05-31

8.  Predicting non-sentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel biopsy in breast cancer: what model performs the best in a Czech population?

Authors:  Oldrich Coufal; Tomás Pavlík; Pavel Fabian; Rita Bori; Gábor Boross; István Sejben; Róbert Maráz; Jaroslav Koca; Eva Krejcí; Iva Horáková; Vendula Foltinová; Pavlína Vrtelová; Vojtech Chrenko; Wolde Eliza Tekle; Mária Rajtár; Mihály Svébis; Vuk Fait; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 9.  Completion of axillary dissection for a positive sentinel node: necessary or not?

Authors:  Kathleen M Erb; Thomas B Julian
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Factors Influencing Non-sentinel Node Involvement in Sentinel Node Positive Patients and Validation of MSKCC Nomogram in Indian Breast Cancer Population.

Authors:  Naveen Padmanabhan; Muhamed Faizal Ayub; Khadher Hussain; Ann Kurien; Selvi Radhakrishna
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.