Literature DB >> 21626428

Comparison of two models for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastases in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients.

Giovanni D'Eredita'1, Vito Leopoldo Troilo, Fernando Fischetti, Giuseppe Rubini, Tommaso Berardi.   

Abstract

Several models for the prediction of non-sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in SLN-positive breast cancer patients have been proposed. In this study, the authors evaluate the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram and an axilla scoring system from Tenon Hospital to predict the probability of having non-(SLN) involvement and to define their actual usefulness when applied to the subgroup of patients with micrometastasis in SLN. The study population consisted of 103 patients: 74 with macrometastasis and 29 with micrometastasis in the SLN. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn and the area under the curves (AUCs) was calculated to assess the discriminative power of the nomograms. Both the ROCs and relative AUCs were calculated for all the patients in the study and for the two subgroups. The AUC for the entire study population was 0.712 in the MSKCC nomogram and 0.759 in the Tenon score. In 74 patients with macrometastasis in SLN, the AUC was 0.760 in MSKCC nomogram and 0.707 in Tenon score. Micrometastasis in SLN was found in t29 patients: AUC was 0.577 in the MSKCC nomogram and 0.738 in the Tenon score. Several institutions have tested the MSKCC nomogram, with AUC ranging from 0.58 to 0.84. It was not validated by four studies, which did not recommend its use in patients with micrometastasis. In our results, the validation of the Tenon score confirmed its relevance even in patients with micrometastasis in SLN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21626428     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-011-0079-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  49 in total

Review 1.  Case against axillary lymphadenectomy for most patients with infiltrating breast cancer.

Authors:  B Cady
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer using subareolar injection of blue dye.

Authors:  K A Kern
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer patients with isolated tumor cells in the sentinel node: implications for completion axillary node dissection.

Authors:  Kristine E Calhoun; Nora M Hansen; Roderick R Turner; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node positivity.

Authors:  N K Soni; H L Carmalt; D J Gillett; A J Spillane
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Sentinel lymph node micrometastasis and risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis: validation of two breast cancer nomograms.

Authors:  Giovanni D'Eredità; Vito Leopoldo Troilo; Carmela Giardina; Anna Napoli; Giuseppe Rubini; Fernando Fischetti; Tommaso Berardi
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  A decision aid for predicting non-sentinel node involvement in women with breast cancer and at least one positive sentinel node.

Authors:  Gelareh Farshid; Malcolm Pradhan; James Kollias; P Grantley Gill
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Use and limitations of a nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after a positive sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lajos Kocsis; Mihály Svébis; Gábor Boross; Mária Sinkó; Róbert Maráz; Mária Rajtár; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Validation of the Tenon breast cancer score for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Charles Coutant; Roman Rouzier; Eric Fondrinier; Frederic Marchal; François Guillemin; Nathalie Seince; Anabella Rodrigues; Emile Darai; Serge Uzan; Emmanuel Barranger
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer--results of the ALMANAC validation phase.

Authors:  Amit Goyal; Robert G Newcombe; Alok Chhabra; Robert E Mansel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  3 in total

1.  In breast cancer patients sentinel lymph node metastasis characteristics predict further axillary involvement.

Authors:  Ildiko Illyes; Anna-Maria Tokes; Attila Kovacs; A Marcell Szasz; Bela A Molnar; Istvan A Molnar; Ilona Kaszas; Zsuzsanna Baranyak; Zsolt Laszlo; Istvan Kenessey; Janina Kulka
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: evaluation of the tenon score.

Authors:  Y Andersson; J Frisell; J de Boniface; L Bergkvist
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2012-01-30

3.  Validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node-positive breast-cancer patients.

Authors:  Xiang Bi; Yongsheng Wang; Minmin Li; Peng Chen; Zhengbo Zhou; Yanbing Liu; Tong Zhao; Zhaopeng Zhang; Chunjian Wang; Xiao Sun; Pengfei Qiu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.