Literature DB >> 17291782

Effects of neuronal magnetic fields on MRI: numerical analysis with axon and dendrite models.

Tae Seok Park1, Soo Yeol Lee.   

Abstract

Whether the neuronal magnetic fields (NMFs) could cause measurable MRI signal changes in the human brain seems to be still controversial. In this study, we have numerically investigated the NMF effects on the MRI signal using two separate current source models for axons and dendrites. Since intracellular current distributions are different in axons and dendrites, the NMFs emanating from axons and dendrites are also very different from each other. Due to the quadripole configuration of the intracellular current flowing through an axon, the axonal magnetic field is bipolar causing virtually no changes in the MRI signal. On the contrary, the dendritic magnetic field is unipolar so that its effects can be accumulated during the echo time. The dendritic magnetic field has measurable effects on the MRI signal, but, it is necessary to differentiate the NMF effects from much bigger background BOLD effects to utilize the NMF effects for fMRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17291782     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of oscillating electrical currents.

Authors:  Nicholas W Halpern-Manners; Vikram S Bajaj; Thomas Z Teisseyre; Alexander Pines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stimulus-induced Rotary Saturation (SIRS): a potential method for the detection of neuronal currents with MRI.

Authors:  Thomas Witzel; Fa-Hsuan Lin; Bruce R Rosen; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Is it possible to detect dendrite currents using presently available magnetic resonance imaging techniques?

Authors:  William I Jay; Ranjith S Wijesinghe; Brain D Dolasinski; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Direct detection of a single evoked action potential with MRS in Lumbricus terrestris.

Authors:  Alexander J Poplawsky; Raymond Dingledine; Xiaoping P Hu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Can high-field MREIT be used to directly detect neural activity? Theoretical considerations.

Authors:  R J Sadleir; S C Grant; E J Woo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of ionic currents in solution: the effect of magnetohydrodynamic flow.

Authors:  Mukund Balasubramanian; Robert V Mulkern; William M Wells; Padmavathi Sundaram; Darren B Orbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Direct neural current imaging in an intact cerebellum with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Padmavathi Sundaram; Aapo Nummenmaa; William Wells; Darren Orbach; Daniel Orringer; Robert Mulkern; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Modeling magnitude and phase neuronal current MRI signal dependence on echo time.

Authors:  Qingfei Luo; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Physiologically evoked neuronal current MRI in a bloodless turtle brain: detectable or not?

Authors:  Qingfei Luo; Huo Lu; Hanbing Lu; David Senseman; Keith Worsley; Yihong Yang; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Similar Spectral Power Densities Within the Schumann Resonance and a Large Population of Quantitative Electroencephalographic Profiles: Supportive Evidence for Koenig and Pobachenko.

Authors:  Kevin S Saroka; David E Vares; Michael A Persinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.