Literature DB >> 20382240

Can high-field MREIT be used to directly detect neural activity? Theoretical considerations.

R J Sadleir1, S C Grant, E J Woo.   

Abstract

We sought to determine the feasibility of directly studying neural tissue activity by analysis of differential phase shifts in MRI signals that occurred when trickle currents were applied to a bath containing active or resting neural tissue. We developed a finite element bidomain model of an aplysia abdominal ganglion in order to estimate the sensitivity of this contrast mechanism to changes in cell membrane conductance occurring during a gill-withdrawal reflex. We used our model to determine both current density and magnetic potential distributions within a sample chamber containing an isolated ganglion when it was illuminated with current injected synchronously with the MR imaging sequence and predicted the resulting changes in MRI phase images. This study provides the groundwork for attempts to image neural function using Magnetic Resonance Electrical Impedance Tomography (MREIT). We found that phase noise in a candidate 17.6 T MRI system should be sufficiently low to detect phase signal differences between active and resting membrane states at resolutions around 1 mm(3). We further delineate the broad dependencies of signal-to-noise ratio on activity frequency, current application time and active tissue fractions and outline strategies that can be used to lower phase noise below that presently observed in conventional MREIT techniques. We also propose the idea of using MREIT as an alternative means of studying neuromodulation. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20382240      PMCID: PMC2903888          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  39 in total

1.  Distributed and partially separate pools of neurons are correlated with two different components of the gill-withdrawal reflex in Aplysia.

Authors:  M Zochowski; L B Cohen; G Fuhrmann; D Kleinfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  High field MREIT: setup and tissue phantom imaging at 11 T.

Authors:  Rosalind Sadleir; Samuel Grant; Sung Uk Zhang; Suk Hoon Oh; Byung Il Lee; Eung Je Woo
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Direct magnetic resonance detection of neuronal electrical activity.

Authors:  Natalia Petridou; Dietmar Plenz; Afonso C Silva; Murray Loew; Jerzy Bodurka; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Hybrid finite element method for describing the electrical response of biological cells to applied fields.

Authors:  Wenjun Ying; Craig S Henriquez
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance.

Authors:  G C Scott; M G Joy; R L Armstrong; R M Henkelman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Failure to direct detect magnetic field dephasing corresponding to ERP generation.

Authors:  Lin Tang; Malcolm J Avison; James C Gatenby; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Magnetic flux density measurement with balanced steady state free precession pulse sequence for MREIT: a simulation study.

Authors:  Atul S Minhas; Eung Je Woo; Soo Yeol Lee
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

9.  Toward direct neural current imaging by resonant mechanisms at ultra-low field.

Authors:  R H Kraus; P Volegov; A Matlachov; M Espy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Nonuniform expression of habituation in the activity of distinct classes of neurons in the Aplysia abdominal ganglion.

Authors:  C X Falk; J Y Wu; L B Cohen; A C Tang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  A cable theory based biophysical model of resistance change in crab peripheral nerve and human cerebral cortex during neuronal depolarisation: implications for electrical impedance tomography of fast neural activity in the brain.

Authors:  Adam Liston; Richard Bayford; David Holder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A novel method for recording neuronal depolarization with recording at 125-825 Hz: implications for imaging fast neural activity in the brain with electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  T Oh; O Gilad; A Ghosh; M Schuettler; D S Holder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Direct detection of neural activity in vitro using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Fanrui Fu; Corey Falgas; Stephen Holland; May Boggess; Samuel C Grant; Eung Je Woo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Dual-tDCS over the right prefrontal cortex does not modulate stop-signal task performance.

Authors:  Maximilian A Friehs; Lisa Brauner; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Development and testing of implanted carbon electrodes for electromagnetic field mapping during neuromodulation.

Authors:  Neeta Ashok Kumar; Munish Chauhan; Sri Kirthi Kandala; Sung-Min Sohn; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Analytic modeling of conductively anisotropic neural tissue.

Authors:  Benjamin L Schwartz; Munish Chauhan; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Evaluation of magnetohydrodynamic effects in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography at ultra-high magnetic fields.

Authors:  Atul S Minhas; Munish Chauhan; Fanrui Fu; Rosalind Sadleir
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Analysis of bipolar external excitation of spherical tissue by spatially opposed current source and sink points.

Authors:  Benjamin L Schwartz; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015

9.  Simultaneous imaging of in vivo conductivity and susceptibility.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Kim; Narae Choi; Sung-Min Gho; Jaewook Shin; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Functional magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (fMREIT) sensitivity analysis using an active bidomain finite-element model of neural tissue.

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Fanrui Fu; Munish Chauhan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.