Literature DB >> 17291549

Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test.

Matthew W G Dye1, Dara E Baril, Daphne Bavelier.   

Abstract

The loss of one sensory modality can lead to a reorganization of the other intact sensory modalities. In the case of individuals who are born profoundly deaf, there is growing evidence of changes in visual functions. Specifically, deaf individuals demonstrate enhanced visual processing in the periphery, and in particular enhanced peripheral visual attention. To further characterize those aspects of visual attention that may be modified by deafness, deaf and hearing individuals were compared on the Attentional Network Test (ANT). The ANT was selected as it provides a measure of the efficiency of three neurally distinct subsystems of visual attention: alerting, orienting and executive control. The alerting measure refers to the efficiency with which a temporal cue is used to direct attention towards a target event, and the orienting measure is an indicator of the efficiency with which a spatial cue focuses attention upon that target's spatial location. The executive control measure, on the other hand, is an indicator of the amount of interference from peripheral flankers on processing that central target. In two separate experiments, deaf and hearing individuals displayed similar alerting and orienting abilities indicating comparable attention across populations. As predicted by enhanced peripheral attention, deaf subjects were found to have larger flanker interference effects than hearing subjects. These results indicate that not all aspects of visual attention are modified by early deafness, suggesting rather specific effects of cross-modal plasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17291549      PMCID: PMC2885017          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  45 in total

1.  Positive and negative compatibility effects.

Authors:  D Bavelier; C Deruelle; J Proksch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-01

2.  A positron emission tomographic study of auditory localization in the congenitally blind.

Authors:  R Weeks; B Horwitz; A Aziz-Sultan; B Tian; C M Wessinger; L G Cohen; M Hallett; J P Rauschecker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual contrast sensitivity in deaf versus hearing populations: exploring the perceptual consequences of auditory deprivation and experience with a visual language.

Authors:  E M Finney; K R Dobkins
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-03

4.  Motion velocity thresholds in deaf signers: changes in lateralization but not in overall sensitivity.

Authors:  Craig J Brozinsky; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-09

5.  Residual sensory capacities of the deaf: a signal detection analysis of a visual discrimination task.

Authors:  M Bross
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1979-02

6.  Parafoveal attention in congenitally deaf and hearing young adults.

Authors:  I Parasnis; V J Samar
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Signal detection analysis of visual flicker in deaf and hearing individuals.

Authors:  M Bross; H Sauerwein
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1980-12

9.  Do deaf people see better? Texture segmentation and visual search compensate in adult but not in juvenile subjects.

Authors:  R Rettenbach; G Diller; R Sireteanu
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Development of attentional networks in childhood.

Authors:  M Rosario Rueda; Jin Fan; Bruce D McCandliss; Jessica D Halparin; Dana B Gruber; Lisha Pappert Lercari; Michael I Posner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  23 in total

1.  Bilingualism and attention: a study of balanced and unbalanced bilingual deaf users of American Sign Language and English.

Authors:  Poorna Kushalnagar; H Julia Hannay; Arturo E Hernandez
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2010-04-18

2.  Foveal Processing Under Concurrent Peripheral Load in Profoundly Deaf Adults.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-12-10

3.  Task-specific reorganization of the auditory cortex in deaf humans.

Authors:  Łukasz Bola; Maria Zimmermann; Piotr Mostowski; Katarzyna Jednoróg; Artur Marchewka; Paweł Rutkowski; Marcin Szwed
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sustained attention, selective attention and cognitive control in deaf and hearing children.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The sign superiority effect: Lexical status facilitates peripheral handshape identification for deaf signers.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Emily Johnson; Amy M Lieberman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Visual skills and cross-modal plasticity in deaf readers: possible implications for acquiring meaning from print.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Chronotype and time-of-day influences on the alerting, orienting, and executive components of attention.

Authors:  Robert L Matchock; J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Perspectives on multisensory experience and cognitive development in infants with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mary K Fagan; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

9.  The development of attention skills in action video game players.

Authors:  M W G Dye; C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Is visual selective attention in deaf individuals enhanced or deficient? The case of the useful field of view.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.