Literature DB >> 11240120

Visual contrast sensitivity in deaf versus hearing populations: exploring the perceptual consequences of auditory deprivation and experience with a visual language.

E M Finney1, K R Dobkins.   

Abstract

Early deafness in humans provides a unique opportunity to examine the perceptual consequences of altered sensory experience. In particular, visual perception in the deaf may be altered as a result of their auditory deprivation and/or because the deaf rely heavily upon a visual language (American Sign Language, or ASL, in the US). Recently, we found that deaf, but not hearing, subjects exhibit a right visual field/left hemisphere advantage on a low-level direction of motion task, a finding that has been attributed to the deaf's experience with ASL [Psychol. Sci. 10 (1999) 256; Brain Res. 405 (1987) 268]. In order to determine whether this visual field asymmetry generalizes to other low-level visual functions, in this study we measured contrast sensitivity in deaf and hearing subjects to moving stimuli over a range of speeds (0.125-64 degrees /s). We hypothesized that if ASL use drives differences between hearing and deaf subjects, such differences may occur over a restricted range of speeds most commonly found in ASL. In addition, we tested a third group, hearing native signers who learned ASL early from their deaf parents, to further assess whether potential differences between groups results from ASL use. These experiments reveal no overall differences in contrast sensitivity, nor differences in visual field asymmetries, across subject groups at any speed tested. Thus, differences previously observed between deaf and hearing subjects for discriminating the direction of moving stimuli do not generalize to contrast sensitivity for moving stimuli, a result that has implications for the neural level at which plastic changes occur in the visual system of deaf subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11240120     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00082-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  20 in total

1.  Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf.

Authors:  Stephen G Lomber; M Alex Meredith; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Do deaf individuals see better?

Authors:  Daphne Bavelier; Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Dara E Baril; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Visual temporal order judgment in profoundly deaf individuals.

Authors:  Elena Nava; Davide Bottari; Massimiliano Zampini; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Crossmodal reorganization in the early deaf switches sensory, but not behavioral roles of auditory cortex.

Authors:  M Alex Meredith; James Kryklywy; Amee J McMillan; Shveta Malhotra; Ryan Lum-Tai; Stephen G Lomber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cortical plasticity for visuospatial processing and object recognition in deaf and hearing signers.

Authors:  Jill Weisberg; Daniel S Koo; Kelly L Crain; Guinevere F Eden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The sign superiority effect: Lexical status facilitates peripheral handshape identification for deaf signers.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Emily Johnson; Amy M Lieberman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Visual skills and cross-modal plasticity in deaf readers: possible implications for acquiring meaning from print.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Deafness and visual enumeration: not all aspects of attention are modified by deafness.

Authors:  Peter C Hauser; Matthew W G Dye; Mrim Boutla; C Shawn Green; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Visual movement perception in deaf and hearing individuals.

Authors:  Nadine Hauthal; Pascale Sandmann; Stefan Debener; Jeremy D Thorne
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.