Literature DB >> 10703259

Positive and negative compatibility effects.

D Bavelier1, C Deruelle, J Proksch.   

Abstract

This paper reports a series of four experiments that established a negative compatibility effect (NCE) by which compatible distractors led to slower and less accurate target performance than did incompatible ones (Experiment 1). This effect is interpreted as an early perceptual effect that delays the attribution of visual attention over the target location in the compatible condition. This view predicted that the NCE should be observed only when attention has to be selectively attributed to the target location. In Experiments 2 and 3, this prediction was tested by manipulating the perceptual load in the display. High perceptual load displays are known to require selective attention (Lavie, 1995). Accordingly, reliable NCEs were observed when high-load displays were used. In contrast, reduced NCEs were found in displays that did not require selective attention. Experiment 4 established that the manifestation of the NCE was influenced by low-level visual cues, such as brightness and contrast. Overall, these experiments indicated that the NCE can be understood as an early perceptual effect, which arises from a conflict between the cues that guide the distribution of attention when the task requires selective attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10703259     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  13 in total

1.  Controlling for dilution while manipulating load: perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty.

Authors:  Hanna Benoni; Yehoshua Tsal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Dara E Baril; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Perceptual load in sport and the heuristic value of the perceptual load paradigm in examining expertise-related perceptual-cognitive adaptations.

Authors:  Philip Furley; Daniel Memmert; Simone Schmid
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-10-10

4.  Individual differences at high perceptual load: the relation between trait anxiety and selective attention.

Authors:  Naomi Sadeh; Keith Bredemeier
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2011-06

5.  Tight coupling between positive and reversed priming in the masked prime paradigm.

Authors:  Frederic Boy; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Changes in early cortical visual processing predict enhanced reactivity in deaf individuals.

Authors:  Davide Bottari; Anne Caclin; Marie-Hélène Giard; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Automatic motor activation in the executive control of action.

Authors:  Jennifer McBride; Frédéric Boy; Masud Husain; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Learning to read aligns visual analytical skills with grapheme-phoneme mapping: evidence from illiterates.

Authors:  Thomas Lachmann; Gunjan Khera; Narayanan Srinivasan; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Front Evol Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-12

9.  Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction.

Authors:  Carmel Mevorach; Yehoshua Tsal; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-10

10.  The relationship between reversed masked priming and the tri-phasic pattern of the lateralised readiness potential.

Authors:  Ellen Seiss; Marie Klippel; Christopher Hope; Frederic Boy; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.