Literature DB >> 1728998

The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials.

R Huiskes1, H Weinans, B van Rietbergen.   

Abstract

Bone resorption around hip stems is a disturbing phenomenon, although its clinical significance and its eventual effects on replacement longevity are as yet uncertain. The relationship between implant flexibility and the extent of bone loss, frequently established in clinical patient series and animal experiments, does suggest that the changes in bone morphology are an effect of stress shielding and a subsequent adaptive remodeling process. This relationship was investigated using strain-adaptive bone-remodeling theory in combination with finite element models to simulate the bone remodeling process. The effects of stem material flexibility, bone flexibility, and bone reactivity on the process and its eventual outcome were studied. Stem flexibility was also related to proximal implant/bone interface stresses. The results sustain the hypothesis that the resorptive processes are an effect of bone adaptation to stress shielding. The effects of stem flexibility are confirmed by the simulation analysis. It was also established that individual differences in bone reactivity and mechanical bone quality (density and stiffness) may account for the individual variations found in patients and animal experiments. Flexible stems reduce stress shielding and bone resorption. However, they increase proximal interface stresses. Hence, the cure against bone resorption they represent may develop into increased loosening rates because of interface debonding and micromotion. The methods presented in this paper can be used to establish optimal stem-design characteristics or check the adequacy of designs in preclinical testing procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1728998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  123 in total

1.  Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.

Authors:  Matthias Lerch; Annelene von der Haar-Tran; Henning Windhagen; Bernd A Behrens; Patrick Wefstaedt; Christina M Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.

Authors:  A I A Rahmy; T Gosens; G M Blake; A Tonino; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Computational simulations of stress shielding and bone resorption around existing and computer-designed orthopaedic screws.

Authors:  A Gefen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Short-term and long-term effects of orthopedic biodegradable implants.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; James S Wallace; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2011

5.  Enhanced osteointegration of orthopaedic implant gradient coating composed of bioactive glass and nanohydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Xin-Hui Xie; Xiao-Wei Yu; Shao-Xian Zeng; Rui-Lin Du; Yu-Huai Hu; Zhen Yuan; Er-Yi Lu; Ke-Rong Dai; Ting-Ting Tang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Production, characterisation, and cytocompatibility of porous titanium-based particulate scaffolds.

Authors:  B J C Luthringer; F Ali; H Akaichi; F Feyerabend; T Ebel; R Willumeit
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Katherine M Bedigrew; Erin L Ruh; Qin Zhang; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].

Authors:  A Roth; G Richartz; K Sander; A Sachse; R Fuhrmann; A Wagner; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  [Shaft lengthening in hip replacement: experimental studies on bending stiffness].

Authors:  K Burkhart; D Mehler; J Degreif; P M Rommens
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Late remodeling around a proximally HA-coated tapered titanium femoral component.

Authors:  William N Capello; James A D'Antonio; Rudolph G Geesink; Judy R Feinberg; Marybeth Naughton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.