Literature DB >> 16388684

Center of pressure measures during standing tasks in minimally impaired persons with multiple sclerosis.

Gregory M Karst1, Dawn M Venema, Tammy G Roehrs, Amy E Tyler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Balance impairments are common in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), but clinical balance tests may not detect subtle deficits in adults with MS who are not yet experiencing functional limitations or disability. The purpose of this study was to determine if center of pressure (COP) displacement during standing tasks could be a useful performance-based evaluative measure for adults with MS who have minimal or no balance deficits on clinical examination using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one adults with MS were compared with 21 age- and gendermatched healthy adults. Subjects with MS were tested with the BBS, Mini-mental State Exam, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC). They also performed voluntary leaning and reaching movements while kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Control subjects performed the same tasks with the exception of the EDSS and MSFC.
RESULTS: COP displacement during reaching and leaning was less in adults with MS when compared to control subjects. There were no differences in anthropometric, kinematic, or foot position variables that could account for this difference. Furthermore, there was no difference between groups when COP displacement during reaching was expressed as a percentage of the maximum COP displacement during leaning. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: COP measures show clear differences when comparing healthy adults with minimally impaired adults with MS. The lack of between-group differences when COP displacement during reaching was expressed as a percentage of the maximum COP displacement during leaning suggests that the subjects with MS adopt a reaching strategy that allows them to stay within their reduced limits of stability. COP measures during standing tasks appear well-suited to quantifying changes in postural control over time or in response to intervention for minimally impaired persons with MS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16388684     DOI: 10.1097/01.npt.0000282314.40230.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther        ISSN: 1557-0576            Impact factor:   3.649


  34 in total

1.  Evaluation of an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) modeling strategy in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Hua Cao; Laurent Peyrodie; Olivier Agnani; Fabrice Cavillon; Patrick Hautecoeur; Cécile Donzé
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Development of a more robust tool for postural stability analysis of laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Gyusung Lee; Adrian E Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Fractal properties of postural sway during quiet stance with changed visual and proprioceptive inputs.

Authors:  Katerina Stambolieva
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Strategies used by individuals with multiple sclerosis and with mild disability to maintain dynamic stability during a steering task.

Authors:  Luke T Denommé; Patricia Mandalfino; Michael E Cinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Understanding balance differences in individuals with multiple sclerosis with mild disability: an investigation of differences in sensory feedback on postural control during a Romberg task.

Authors:  Luke T Denommé; Patricia Mandalfino; Michael E Cinelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Coherence analysis of trunk and leg acceleration reveals altered postural sway strategy during standing in persons with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jessie Huisinga; Martina Mancini; Chris Veys; Rebecca Spain; Fay Horak
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  Postural response latencies are related to balance control during standing and walking in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jessie M Huisinga; Rebecca J St George; Rebecca Spain; Shannon Overs; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Validity of the Instrumented Push and Release Test to Quantify Postural Responses in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Mahmoud El-Gohary; Daniel Peterson; Geetanjali Gera; Fay B Horak; Jessie M Huisinga
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Postural control is associated with cognition and fear of falling in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A Perrochon; R Holtzer; M Laidet; S Armand; F Assal; P H Lalive; G Allali
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Movement strategies for maintaining standing balance during arm tracking in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Matthew C Chua; Allison S Hyngstrom; Alexander V Ng; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.