Literature DB >> 2227477

Rapid assessment of the visual field in glaucoma using an analysis based on multiple correlations.

M Gonzalez de la Rosa1, J A Reyes, M A Gonzalez Sierra.   

Abstract

We wished to determine which areas of the visual field contribute most strongly and most frequently to the deterioration of the visual fields in patients with high ocular pressure. The computerized analysis, using linear and multiple regressions of the findings in 382 visual fields, allowed us to select four test points sensitive enough to estimate the actual global sensitivity of the central visual field (correlation coefficient, 0.98). This system also allowed us to estimate the number of pathological points and even to classify accurately over 75% of the cases in terms of their normal or pathological condition, as well as to determine the depth of the defect. The remaining cases show that the deterioration, if it exists, is not significant. Requiring less than 1 min a threshold examination at these four test points enables us to acquire greater insight into the glaucomatous defect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2227477     DOI: 10.1007/bf00927247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  6 in total

1.  Cluster analysis in visual field quantification.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; D B Henson; A J Hobley
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The cumulative defect curve: separation of local and diffuse components of visual field damage.

Authors:  H Bebie; J Flammer; T Bebie
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  [Procedures for the quantitative follow-up control of computerized perimetric findings in glaucoma].

Authors:  F Grehn; G Burkard
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 0.700

4.  Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; L Augustiny; A Funkhouser
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; M Zulauf
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05

6.  [White noise field campimetry. A new form of perimetric examination].

Authors:  E Aulhorn; G Köst
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 0.700

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Is oculokinetic perimetry useful?

Authors:  J A Abreu Reyes; M Gonzalez de la Rosa; M Sanchez Mendez; C G Mesa Moreno; R Santos Barrera
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Stabilization and comparison of TOP and Bracketing perimetric strategies using a threshold spatial filter.

Authors:  Manuel Gonzalez de la Rosa; Marta Gonzalez-Hernandez; Tinguaro Diaz Aleman; Manuel Sanchez Mendez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Computerized expert system for evaluation of automated visual fields from the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial: methods, baseline fields, and six-month longitudinal follow-up.

Authors:  Steven E Feldon
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

4.  Development and validation of a computerized expert system for evaluation of automated visual fields from the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial.

Authors:  Steven E Feldon; Lori Levin; Roberta W Scherer; Anthony Arnold; Sophia M Chung; Lenworth N Johnson; Gregory Kosmorsky; Steven A Newman; Joanne Katz; Patricia Langenberg; P David Wilson; Shalom E Kelman; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Diagnostic Ability and Repeatability of a New Supra-Threshold Glaucoma Screening Program in Standard Automated Perimetry.

Authors:  Natsumi Takahashi; Kazunori Hirasawa; Miki Hoshina; Masayuki Kasahara; Kazuhiro Matsumura; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Development of Visual Field Screening Procedures: A Case Study of the Octopus Perimeter.

Authors:  Andrew Turpin; Jonathan S Myers; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Sequentially optimized reconstruction strategy: A meta-strategy for perimetry testing.

Authors:  Şerife Seda Kucur; Raphael Sznitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.