Literature DB >> 17285279

Evaluation of dose exposure in 64-slice CT colonography.

O Luz1, M Buchgeister, M Klabunde, T Trabold, A F Kopp, C D Claussen, M Heuschmid.   

Abstract

The radiation exposure of four different 64-slice MDCT-colonography (CTC) protocols was evaluated using an Alderson-Rando phantom. Protocols using 30 mAs (collimation 20 x 1.2 mm), 50 mAs (collimation 20 x 1.2 and 64 x 0.6 mm) and 80 mAs (20 x 1.2 mm) representing screening low-dose, routine, narrow collimation and oncologic staging setups were measured with an Alderson-Rando phantom (Alderson Research Laboratories Inc.). Scans were performed on a 64-row MDCT (SOMATOM Sensation 64, Siemens) simulating the prone and supine positions with a constant voltage of 120 kV. Dose values (male/female) were 2.5/2.9, 3.8/4.2, 4.2/4.5 and 5.7/6.4 mSv for 30, 50 (20 x 1.2 and 64 x 0.6 mm) and 80 mAs, respectively. Measurements showed an elevated dose for females (11.5% mean; compared to males). Use of narrow collimation combined with 50 mAs resulted in a small increase of dose exposure of 10.5 (male) and 7.1% (female). Gonad doses ranged from 0.9 to 2.6 mSv (male) and from 1.5 to 3.5 mSv (female). In all protocols, the stomach wall, lower colon, urinary bladder and liver were slightly more highly exposed (all <2.3 mSv) than the other organs, and the breast dose was <0.3 mSv in every setup. Values of radiation exposure in 64- and 16-slice CTC differ only marginally when using the narrow collimation. In 64-slice CTC, the use of narrow (64 x 0.6 mm) collimation shows slightly elevated dose values compared to wider (20 x 1.2 mm) collimation.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17285279     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0601-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

1.  Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications.

Authors:  K Klingenbeck-Regn; S Schaller; T Flohr; B Ohnesorge; A F Kopp; U Baum
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  [Early detection of colorectal tumors: CT or MRI?].

Authors:  W Luboldt; N Hoepffner; K Holzer; V Jacobi; K Willenbrock; G Woeste; W O Bechstein; T J Vogl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row versus electron-beam CT.

Authors:  Andreas F Kopp; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christoph Becker; Stephen Schröder; Martin Heuschmid; Axel Küttner; Ronald Kuzo; Claus D Claussen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Tom H Mulkens; Patrick Bellinck; Michel Baeyaert; Dirk Ghysen; Xavier Van Dijck; Elvier Mussen; Caroline Venstermans; Jean-Luc Termote
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  [CT-colonography: current status and future directions in consideration of the technical evolution].

Authors:  O Luz; J F Schäfer; M Heuschmid; D Stüker; C D Claussen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  CT dose reduction in children.

Authors:  Peter Vock
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; C D Johnson; T J Welch; R L MacCarty; D A Ahlquist; J E Reed; W S Harmsen; L A Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  [Evaluation of different 16-row CT colonography protocols using a porcine model].

Authors:  O Luz; J Schäfer; F Dammann; R Vonthein; M Heuschmid; C D Claussen
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-10

9.  Multi-slice CT-colonography in low-dose technique--Preliminary results.

Authors:  M Cohnen; C Vogt; V Aurich; A Beck; D Häussinger; U Mödder
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-07

10.  CT colonography: Protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT--study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.

Authors:  Johannes Wessling; Roman Fischbach; Norbert Meier; Thomas Allkemper; Jutta Klusmeier; Karl Ludwig; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  Dose reduction in spiral CT coronary angiography with dual source equipment. Part II. Dose surplus due to slope-up and slope-down of prospective tube current modulation in a phantom model.

Authors:  C Martini; A Palumbo; E Maffei; A Rossi; M Rengo; R Malagò; M Dijkshoorn; A Weustink; N Mollet; G Krestin; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Radiation dose in CT colonography--trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols.

Authors:  M H Liedenbaum; H W Venema; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Dose reduction in spiral CT coronary angiography with dual-source equipment. Part I. A phantom study applying different prospective tube current modulation algorithms.

Authors:  C Martini; A Palumbo; E Maffei; A Rossi; M Rengo; R Malagò; M Dijkshoorn; A Weustink; N Mollet; G Krestin; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Fluctuation in measurements of pulmonary nodule under tidal volume ventilation on four-dimensional computed tomography: preliminary results.

Authors:  Ukihide Tateishi; Shinsuke Tsukagoshi; Hiroyasu Inokawa; Miwa Okumura; Noriyuki Moriyama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Patric Kröpil; Roland Fenk; Lars B Fritz; Dirk Blondin; Guido Kobbe; Ulrich Mödder; Mathias Cohnen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.