| Literature DB >> 17285146 |
Michael A Brockhurst1, Nick Colegrave, David J Hodgson, Angus Buckling.
Abstract
Adaptive radiations have played a key role in the evolution of biological diversity. The breadth of adaptive radiation in an invading lineage is likely to be influenced by the availability of ecological niches, which will be determined to some extent by the diversity of the resident community. High resident diversity may result in existing ecological niches being filled, inhibiting subsequent adaptive radiation. Conversely, high resident diversity could result in the creation of novel ecological niches or an increase in within niche competition driving niche partitioning, thus promoting subsequent diversification. We tested the role of resident diversity on adaptive radiations in experimental populations of the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens that readily diversify into a range of niche specialists when grown in a heterogeneous environment. We allowed an undiversified strain to invade resident communities that varied in the number of niche specialists. The breadth of adaptive radiation attainable by an invading lineage decreased with increasing niche occupation of the resident community. Our results highlight the importance of niche occupation as a constraint on adaptive radiation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17285146 PMCID: PMC1781339 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Details of constructed mixtures and their morphotypic and spatial niche specialist class diversities.
| Resident community | Morphotypic diversity | Spatial niche diversity |
| s1s6 | 2 | 1 |
| s2s4 | 2 | 1 |
| s5s3 | 2 | 1 |
| f3f5 | 2 | 1 |
| f1f2 | 2 | 1 |
| f4f6 | 2 | 1 |
| w3w6 | 2 | 1 |
| w5w4 | 2 | 1 |
| w1w2 | 2 | 1 |
| s6w4 | 2 | 2 |
| s4w2 | 2 | 2 |
| w6f5 | 2 | 2 |
| w5f4 | 2 | 2 |
| s3f1 | 2 | 2 |
| s1f2 | 2 | 2 |
| s2w1 | 2 | 2 |
| s5f3 | 2 | 2 |
| f6w3 | 2 | 2 |
| s5s3s1 | 3 | 1 |
| s2s6s4 | 3 | 1 |
| w1w2w3 | 3 | 1 |
| w4w5w6 | 3 | 1 |
| f3f4f6 | 3 | 1 |
| f1f2f5 | 3 | 1 |
| s1s6w1 | 3 | 2 |
| s4s5f1 | 3 | 2 |
| w2w3f3 | 3 | 2 |
| w4w5s3 | 3 | 2 |
| f4f5s2 | 3 | 2 |
| f2f6w6 | 3 | 2 |
| s2f3w5 | 3 | 3 |
| s4f2w4 | 3 | 3 |
| s3f6w6 | 3 | 3 |
| s5f4w2 | 3 | 3 |
| s6f5w3 | 3 | 3 |
| s1f1w1 | 3 | 3 |
| s1s2s3s4s5s6 | 6 | 1 |
| w1w2w3w4w5w6 | 6 | 1 |
| f1f2f3f4f5f6 | 6 | 1 |
| s2s3s6w1w5w6 | 6 | 2 |
| w2w3w4f3f4f5 | 6 | 2 |
| s1s4s5f1f2f6 | 6 | 2 |
| s1s6f1f4w4w5 | 6 | 3 |
| s3s5f2f6w1w3 | 6 | 3 |
| s2s4f3f5w2w6 | 6 | 3 |
The 18 monocultures are not shown. s = smooth; f = fuzzy spreader; w = wrinkly spreader.
Figure 1Diversification of an initially rare invading lineage as a function of the number of resident niche specialists. Bars show mean (+SEM) number of novel morphologically distinct morphotypes; this value does not include the invading ancestral genotype.
Populations containing evolved spatial niche specialists as a function of the presence or absence of resident spatial niche specialists.
| RESIDENT SPATIAL NICHE SPECIALIST | ||||||
| WS | SM | FS | ||||
| EVOLVED SPATIAL NICHE SPECIALIST | PRESENT | ABSENT | PRESENT | ABSENT | PRESENT | ABSENT |
| WS | 0/33 | 30/36 | 14/33 | 17/36 | 14/33 | 16/36 |
| SM | 10/33 | 10/36 | 10/33 | 17/36 | 8/33 | 18/36 |
| FS | 0/33 | 7/36 | 4/33 | 3/36 | 0/33 | 7/36 |