Literature DB >> 29593112

Specific adaptation to strong competitors can offset the negative effects of population size reductions.

Xin-Feng Zhao1,2, Angus Buckling3, Quan-Guo Zhang2, Elze Hesse3.   

Abstract

Competition plays a crucial role in determining adaptation of species, yet we know little as to how adaptation is affected by the strength of competition. On the one hand, strong competition typically results in population size reductions, which can hamper adaptation owing to a shortage of beneficial mutations; on the other hand, specificity of adaptation to competitors may offset the negative evolutionary consequences of such population size effects. Here, we investigate how competition strength affects population fitness in the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Our results demonstrate that strong competition constrains adaptation of focal populations, which can be partially explained by population size reductions. However, fitness assays also reveal specific adaptation of focal populations to particular competitors varying in competitive ability. Additionally, this specific adaptation can offset the negative effects of competitor-mediated population size reductions under strong competition. Our study, therefore, highlights the importance of opposing effects of strong competition on species adaptation, which may lead to different outcomes of colonization under intense and relaxed competitive environments in the context of population dispersal.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pseudomonas fluorescens; adaptation; competition strength; population size reduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29593112      PMCID: PMC5897643          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  27 in total

1.  The role of parasites in sympatric and allopatric host diversification.

Authors:  Angus Buckling; Paul B Rainey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Experimental evolution of Pseudomonas fluorescens in simple and complex environments.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; R Craig MacLean; Graham Bell
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Evolution of character displacement in Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Biodiversity inhibits species' evolutionary responses to changing environments.

Authors:  C de Mazancourt; E Johnson; T G Barraclough
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Competition both drives and impedes diversification in a model adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Susan F Bailey; Jeremy R Dettman; Paul B Rainey; Rees Kassen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  P B Rainey; M Travisano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population.

Authors:  P J Gerrish; R E Lenski
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Physical and genetic map of the Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 chromosome.

Authors:  P B Rainey; M J Bailey
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Species interactions alter evolutionary responses to a novel environment.

Authors:  Diane Lawrence; Francesca Fiegna; Volker Behrends; Jacob G Bundy; Albert B Phillimore; Thomas Bell; Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Coevolution and the effects of climate change on interacting species.

Authors:  Tobin D Northfield; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Experimental Design, Population Dynamics, and Diversity in Microbial Experimental Evolution.

Authors:  Bram Van den Bergh; Toon Swings; Maarten Fauvart; Jan Michiels
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Specific adaptation to strong competitors can offset the negative effects of population size reductions.

Authors:  Xin-Feng Zhao; Angus Buckling; Quan-Guo Zhang; Elze Hesse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Competitive species interactions constrain abiotic adaptation in a bacterial soil community.

Authors:  James P J Hall; Ellie Harrison; Michael A Brockhurst
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2018-09-25

4.  Performance in a novel environment subject to ghost competition.

Authors:  Karen Bisschop; Frederik Mortier; Dries Bonte; Rampal S Etienne
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.