Literature DB >> 33814976

Container volume may affect growth rates of ciliates and clearance rates of their microcrustacean predators in microcosm experiments.

Thomas Weisse1, Dunja Lukić1, Xiaoteng Lu1.   

Abstract

We studied the effect of volume in small containers (microcosms) on five common planktonic freshwater ciliates and three zooplankton species, namely Daphnia sp., the calanoid copepod Eudiaptomus sp., and the cyclopoid copepod Cyclops sp. We measured ciliate specific growth rates and their loss rates due to microcrustacean predation in short-term experiments. We hypothesized that container volume ranging from 10 to 200 mL would not affect the activity of our prey and predator species. We found that the response to volume was species-specific; growth rates of three ciliate species were sensitive to volume. However, the volume effect was not unequivocal because different timing of the microcosm experiments (block effects) may have caused random bias due to varying morphological and/or physiological conditions of the ciliates and their predators. For predator clearance rate, the volume effect was insignificant in the filter-feeding Daphnia and Eudiaptomus but was significant for the predatory copepod Cyclops, which was hampered in the smallest experimental containers. Total crustacean clearance rates averaged over all treatments appeared unaffected by predator species, while ciliate species significantly affected the results. Our growth and clearance rates are close to previous findings with the same or similar planktonic prey and predator species.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyclops; Daphnia; Eudiaptomus; ciliates; growth and clearance rates; volume effect

Year:  2021        PMID: 33814976      PMCID: PMC8009685          DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbab017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plankton Res        ISSN: 0142-7873            Impact factor:   2.455


  11 in total

1.  Disturbance and diversity in experimental microcosms.

Authors:  A Buckling; R Kassen; G Bell; P B Rainey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  How zooplankton feed: mechanisms, traits and trade-offs.

Authors:  Thomas Kiørboe
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-05

Review 3.  Fate of heterotrophic microbes in pelagic habitats: focus on populations.

Authors:  Jakob Pernthaler; Rudolf Amann
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Seasonal succession of ciliates in lake constance.

Authors:  H Müller; A Schöne; R M Pinto-Coelho; A Schweizer; T Weisse
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Selection of low investment in sex in a cyclically parthenogenetic rotifer.

Authors:  M J Carmona; N Dimas-Flores; E M García-Roger; M Serra
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Critical evaluation of the volumetric "bottle effect" on microbial batch growth.

Authors:  Frederik Hammes; Marius Vital; Thomas Egli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Functional ecology of aquatic phagotrophic protists - Concepts, limitations, and perspectives.

Authors:  Thomas Weisse; Ruth Anderson; Hartmut Arndt; Albert Calbet; Per Juel Hansen; David J S Montagnes
Journal:  Eur J Protistol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Effects of microcosm scaling and food resources on growth and survival of larval Culex pipiens.

Authors:  G Wynn; C J Paradise
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 2.964

9.  Temperature × light interaction and tolerance of high water temperature in the planktonic freshwater flagellates Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae) and Dinobryon (Chrysophyceae).

Authors:  Christina Wirth; Romana Limberger; Thomas Weisse
Journal:  J Phycol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.923

10.  Niche occupation limits adaptive radiation in experimental microcosms.

Authors:  Michael A Brockhurst; Nick Colegrave; David J Hodgson; Angus Buckling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Top-down control of planktonic ciliates by microcrustacean predators is stronger in lakes than in the ocean.

Authors:  Xiaoteng Lu; Thomas Weisse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.