Literature DB >> 17283203

Distinct and convergent visual processing of high and low spatial frequency information in faces.

Pia Rotshtein1, Patrik Vuilleumier, Joel Winston, Jon Driver, Ray Dolan.   

Abstract

We tested for differential brain response to distinct spatial frequency (SF) components in faces. During a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment, participants were presented with "hybrid" faces containing superimposed low and high SF information from different identities. We used a repetition paradigm where faces at either SF range were independently repeated or changed across consecutive trials. In addition, we manipulated which SF band was attended. Our results suggest that repetition and attention affected partly overlapping occipitotemporal regions but did not interact. Changes of high SF faces increased responses of the right inferior occipital gyrus (IOG) and left inferior temporal gyrus (ITG), with the latter response being also modulated additively by attention. In contrast, the bilateral middle occipital gyrus (MOG) responded to repetition and attention manipulations of low SF. A common effect of high and low SF repetition was observed in the right fusiform gyrus (FFG). Follow-up connectivity analyses suggested direct influence of the MOG (low SF), IOG, and ITG (high SF) on the FFG responses. Our results reveal that different regions within occipitotemporal cortex extract distinct visual cues at different SF ranges in faces and that the outputs from these separate processes project forward to the right FFG, where the different visual cues may converge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17283203      PMCID: PMC2600423          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  68 in total

Review 1.  Integrated model of visual processing.

Authors:  J Bullier
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-10

2.  Corticopulvinar connections of areas V5, V4, and V3 in the macaque monkey: a dual model of retinal and cortical topographies.

Authors:  S Shipp
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2001-10-29       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Blindsight: the role of feedforward and feedback corticocortical connections.

Authors:  V A Lamme
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-04

4.  The role of priming in conjunctive visual search.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; DeLiang Wang; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-08

5.  Cerebral pathways in processing of affective prosody: a dynamic causal modeling study.

Authors:  Thomas Ethofer; Silke Anders; Michael Erb; Cornelia Herbert; Sarah Wiethoff; Johanna Kissler; Wolfgang Grodd; Dirk Wildgruber
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Attentional modulation of learning-related repetition attenuation effects in human parahippocampal cortex.

Authors:  Do-Joon Yi; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A Puce; A Belger; T Allison
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The recognition of faces.

Authors:  L D Harmon
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.142

View more
  34 in total

1.  Bidirectional communication between amygdala and fusiform gyrus during facial recognition.

Authors:  John D Herrington; James M Taylor; Daniel W Grupe; Kim M Curby; Robert T Schultz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The Fusiform Face Area responds automatically to statistical regularities optimal for face categorization.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Pulvinar neurons reveal neurobiological evidence of past selection for rapid detection of snakes.

Authors:  Quan Van Le; Lynne A Isbell; Jumpei Matsumoto; Minh Nguyen; Etsuro Hori; Rafael S Maior; Carlos Tomaz; Anh Hai Tran; Taketoshi Ono; Hisao Nishijo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation disrupts the perception and embodiment of facial expressions.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Lúcia Garrido; Vincent Walsh; Bradley C Duchaine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Category-selective background connectivity in ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Samuel V Norman-Haignere; Gregory McCarthy; Marvin M Chun; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity.

Authors:  Anthony P Atkinson; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Modulating adaptation to emotional faces by spatial frequency filtering.

Authors:  Giulia Prete; Bruno Laeng; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-11-26

8.  Post-Encoding Amygdala-Visuosensory Coupling Is Associated with Negative Memory Bias in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Sarah M Kark; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Dynamics of trimming the content of face representations for categorization in the brain.

Authors:  Nicola J van Rijsbergen; Philippe G Schyns
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Natural facial motion enhances cortical responses to faces.

Authors:  Johannes Schultz; Karin S Pilz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.