BACKGROUND: A newly available, laparoscopic 5-mm bipolar vessel sealing device promises substantial advantages over the 10-mm instrument. This study compared the safety as well as the technical and surgical aspects of these different tools. METHODS: For this study, 30 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic left-sided colectomy were prospectively randomized for the 5-mm LigaSure or The 10-mm LigaSure. The patients' demographics were analyzed together with their intraoperative and postoperative parameters, and the instruments were assessed by the surgeons with a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable and demonstrated similar mean operation times, blood losses, and hospital stays. The 5-mm LigaSure was applied in more operation steps and resulted in fewer bleeding episodes and less lens cleaning. Monopolar scissors were used less frequently in the 5-mm group, thus minimizing cauteric lesions and their complications (0 in the 5-mm group vs 2 in the 10-mm group). Overall satisfaction with the 5-mm LigaSure was significantly higher (8.4 +/- 0.18 vs 6.9 +/- 0.41 out of 10; p = 0.002), with significant advantages in terms of dissection capacity, visibility, and handling. CONCLUSION: The 5-mm LigaSure is as secure and fast as the larger 10-mm device and compares favorably in terms of finer dissection as well as trocar flexibility and handling. Therefore, it can be used safely in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A newly available, laparoscopic 5-mm bipolar vessel sealing device promises substantial advantages over the 10-mm instrument. This study compared the safety as well as the technical and surgical aspects of these different tools. METHODS: For this study, 30 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic left-sided colectomy were prospectively randomized for the 5-mm LigaSure or The 10-mm LigaSure. The patients' demographics were analyzed together with their intraoperative and postoperative parameters, and the instruments were assessed by the surgeons with a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable and demonstrated similar mean operation times, blood losses, and hospital stays. The 5-mm LigaSure was applied in more operation steps and resulted in fewer bleeding episodes and less lens cleaning. Monopolar scissors were used less frequently in the 5-mm group, thus minimizing cauteric lesions and their complications (0 in the 5-mm group vs 2 in the 10-mm group). Overall satisfaction with the 5-mm LigaSure was significantly higher (8.4 +/- 0.18 vs 6.9 +/- 0.41 out of 10; p = 0.002), with significant advantages in terms of dissection capacity, visibility, and handling. CONCLUSION: The 5-mm LigaSure is as secure and fast as the larger 10-mm device and compares favorably in terms of finer dissection as well as trocar flexibility and handling. Therefore, it can be used safely in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Authors: B D Matthews; B L Pratt; C L Backus; K W Kercher; G Mostafa; A Lentzner; E H Lipford; R F Sing; B T Heniford Journal: Am Surg Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Jaime Landman; Kurt Kerbl; Jamil Rehman; Cassio Andreoni; Peter A Humphrey; William Collyer; Ephrem Olweny; Chandru Sundaram; Ralph V Clayman Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: R Siegel; M A Cuesta; E Targarona; F G Bader; M Morino; R Corcelles; A M Lacy; L Påhlman; E Haglind; K Bujko; H P Bruch; M M Heiss; M Eikermann; E A M Neugebauer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: P Kambakamba; D Dindo; A Nocito; P A Clavien; B Seifert; M Schäfer; D Hahnloser Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Tobias Gehrig; Phillip Knebel; Verena Scheel; Ulf Hinz; Christoph M Seiler; Beat P Müller-Stich; Markus W Büchler; Carsten N Gutt Journal: Trials Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Martin Hübner; Markus W Sigrist; Nicolas Demartines; Michele Gianella; Pierre A Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser Journal: Patient Saf Surg Date: 2008-09-19