Literature DB >> 17277657

Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: lateral to medial or medial to lateral dissection?

Garth H Ballantyne1, Douglas Ewing, Alessio Pigazzi, Annette Wasielewski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic colectomy was feasible and could be accomplished safely. Nonetheless, we found that the current iteration of da Vinci was not well suited to a lateral to medial (LtM) dissection of the colonic mesentery. The motion scaling made the large excursion arcs required for adequate exposure in a LtM dissection cumbersome to achieve. AIM: As a result, the aim of this study was to compare the ability of the da Vinci telerobotic surgical system to perform telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using a LtM dissection with a medial to lateral (MtL) dissection technique.
METHODS: We compared 8 consecutive da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed using a LtM dissection to 8 consecutive operations using a MtL dissection technique. Results were compared using analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Age for the 2 groups were not significantly different: LtM 64 (43 to 71) years and MtL 56 (39 to 68) years. Body mass index was similar: LtM 27 (22 to 34) and MtL 25 (20 to 32) kg/m. Total surgical time (including cystoscopy and intraoperative colonoscopy) were similar: LtM 212 (188 to 610) minutes and MtL 203 (135 to 220) minutes. There was no significant difference in lymph node harvest: LtM 12 (3 to 20) lymph nodes and MtL 18 (3 to 35) lymph nodes. There were no deaths or anastomotic leaks in either groups. Median length of stay was similar for both groups: LtM 5 (3 to 10) days and MtL 4 (2 to 9) days.
CONCLUSIONS: da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using a MtL dissection technique achieves similar outcomes as a LtM dissection approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17277657     DOI: 10.1097/01.sle.0000213732.03204.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  11 in total

Review 1.  Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective.

Authors:  M Jung; P Morel; L Buehler; N C Buchs; M E Hagen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; George A Antoniou; Oliver O Koch; Rudolf Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chang Woo Kim; Chang Hee Kim; Seung Hyuk Baik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Henry J Lujan; Victor H Maciel; Roderick Romero; Gustavo Plasencia
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-10-13

5.  D3 lymphadenectomy using a medial to lateral approach for curable right-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Seong Dae Lee; Seok-Byung Lim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  How Has the Robot Contributed to Colon Cancer Surgery?

Authors:  Ozgen Isik; Emre Gorgun
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-12

7.  Long-term results of laparoscopy-assisted radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy: clinical analysis with 177 cases.

Authors:  Ding-Pei Han; Ai-Guo Lu; Hao Feng; Pu-Xiong-Zhi Wang; Qi-Feng Cao; Ya-Ping Zong; Bo Feng; Min-Hua Zheng
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Open Right Hemicolectomy:Lateral to Medial or Medial to Lateral Approach?

Authors:  Pingping Xu; Li Ren; Dexiang Zhu; Qi Lin; Yunshi Zhong; Wentao Tang; Qingyang Feng; Peng Zheng; Meiling Ji; Ye Wei; Jianmin Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Telerobotic gastrointestinal surgery: phase 2--safety and efficacy.

Authors:  G H Ballantyne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 3.453

10.  Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. is it a fair comparison?

Authors:  Weida Day; Patrick Ying Yu Lau
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.