Literature DB >> 27000901

Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy: a single surgeon's experience.

Henry J Lujan1, Victor H Maciel2, Roderick Romero2, Gustavo Plasencia2.   

Abstract

There is increased interest in robotic techniques for colon resection, but the role of robotics in colorectal surgery has not yet been defined. The purpose of this study was to compare our recent experience with robotic right colectomy to that with laparoscopic right colectomy. From November 2008 to June 2011, a total of 47 consecutive patients underwent elective, right colectomy: 25 laparoscopic right colectomies (LRC) and 22 robotic right colectomies (RRC). All procedures in this study were performed by a single, board-certified colon and rectal surgeon (H.J.L.). Main outcomes recorded included conversion rate, operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of extraction sites, length of stay (LOS), and complications. Data studied were prospectively recorded in a database and were retrospectively reviewed. Mean OT for LRC was 107 ± 36.7 min (median 98, range 48-207) and for RRC was 189.1 ± 38.1 min (median 185, range 123-288, P < 0.001). Mean total operating room time (TORT) for LRC was 158.6 ± 38.1 min (median 149, range 104-274) and for RRC was 258.3 ± 40.9 (median 251, range 182-372, P < 0.001). The tendency lines for both OT and TORT decreased over time for RRC. EBL for LRC was 70.2 ± 52.9 ml (median 50, range 10-200) and for RRC was 60.8 ± 71.3 ml (median 40, range 10-300, P = 0.037). The mean extraction site length for the laparoscopic group was 5.3 ± 1.3 cm (median 5, range 4-11) and for the robotic group was 4.6 ± 0.7 cm (median 4.5, range 3.5-6, p = 0.008). LOS was similar for both groups, as were complications. No cases were converted to open. No leaks occurred and there was no 30-day mortality. RRC is safe and feasible, with similar outcomes to LRC. Operative times were longer for RRC; however, they compare favorably with times for LRC published in the literature. Extraction site length and EBL were less for RRC. However, further study is necessary to demonstrate the clinical relevance of these findings. We are optimistic that OT and TORT will continue to improve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colectomy; Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery

Year:  2011        PMID: 27000901     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-011-0320-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  29 in total

1.  Initial experience with 150 cases of laparoscopic assisted colectomy.

Authors:  D M Lauter; E J Froines
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease.

Authors:  Philip A Weber; Stephen Merola; Annette Wasielewski; Garth H Ballantyne
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; A Craig Lynch; Anthony J Senagore; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sergio Maeso; Mercedes Reza; Julio A Mayol; Juan A Blasco; Mercedes Guerra; Elena Andradas; María N Plana
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Learning curve for standardized laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer under supervision: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masashi Ueno; Masatoshi Oya; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Evaluation of midlevel and upper-level residents performing their first robotic-sutured intestinal anastomosis.

Authors:  Slawomir J Marecik; Leela M Prasad; John J Park; Azam Jan; Vivek Chaudhry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

8.  Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections.

Authors:  J Ordemann; C A Jacobi; W Schwenk; R Stösslein; J M Müller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Effect of laparoscopy on the immune system.

Authors:  E Kuhry; J Jeekel; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2004-03
View more
  11 in total

1.  Totally robotic combined right hemicolectomy and nephrectomy.

Authors:  Hubert Perrin; Jean Claude Ortega; Guy Armando; Philippe Brunner; Patrick Hastier; Rémi Dumas; Charles Ferrari
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-02-04

2.  Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Stefano Trastulli; Andrea Coratti; Salvatore Guarino; Riccardo Piagnerelli; Mario Annecchiarico; Francesco Coratti; Michele Di Marino; Francesco Ricci; Jacopo Desiderio; Roberto Cirocchi; Amilcare Parisi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  How Has the Robot Contributed to Colon Cancer Surgery?

Authors:  Ozgen Isik; Emre Gorgun
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-12

4.  A single surgeon's experience transitioning to robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis.

Authors:  Alexandra C W Reitz; Ed Lin; Seth A Rosen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Ileo-colic intra-corporeal anastomosis during robotic right colectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of different techniques.

Authors:  Simone Guadagni; Matteo Palmeri; Matteo Bianchini; Desirée Gianardi; Niccolò Furbetta; Fabrizio Minichilli; Gregorio Di Franco; Annalisa Comandatore; Giulio Di Candio; Luca Morelli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Advantages of Robotic Right Colectomy With Intracorporeal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Henry J Lujan; Gustavo Plasencia; Brian X Rivera; Andres Molano; Alex Fagenson; Louis A Jane; Diego Holguin
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.719

7.  Rate of conversion to an open procedure is reduced in patients undergoing robotic colorectal surgery: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Leah Ellis Wells; Betsy Smith; Michael Drew Honaker
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 8.  Robotic versus Laparoscopic Approach in Colonic Resections for Cancer and Benign Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Trastulli; Roberto Cirocchi; Jacopo Desiderio; Andrea Coratti; Salvatore Guarino; Claudio Renzi; Alessia Corsi; Carlo Boselli; Alberto Santoro; Liliana Minelli; Amilcare Parisi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huirong Xu; Jianning Li; Yanlai Sun; Zengjun Li; Yanan Zhen; Bin Wang; Zhongfa Xu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jong Lyul Lee; Hassan A Alsaleem; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 1.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.