Literature DB >> 17277368

Evolutionary framework for protein sequence evolution and gene pleiotropy.

Xun Gu1.   

Abstract

In this article, we develop an evolutionary model for protein sequence evolution. Gene pleiotropy is characterized by K distinct but correlated components (molecular phenotypes) that affect the organismal fitness. These K molecular phenotypes are under stabilizing selection with microadaptation (SM) due to random optima shifts, the SM model. Random coding mutations generate a correlated distribution of K molecular phenotypes. Under this SM model, we further develop a statistical method to estimate the "effective" number of molecular phenotypes (K(e)) of the gene. Therefore, for the first time we can empirically evaluate gene pleiotropy from the protein sequence analysis. Case studies of vertebrate proteins indicate that K(e) is typically approximately 6-9. We demonstrate that the newly developed SM model of protein evolution may provide a basis for exploring genomic evolution and correlations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17277368      PMCID: PMC1855142          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.066530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  40 in total

1.  Fitness effects of advantageous mutations in evolving Escherichia coli populations.

Authors:  M Imhof; C Schlotterer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Estimating the distribution of fitness effects from DNA sequence data: implications for the molecular clock.

Authors:  Gwenaël Piganeau; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The evolution of a pleiotropic fitness tradeoff in Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Authors:  R Craig MacLean; Graham Bell; Paul B Rainey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Model of effectively neutral mutations in which selective constraint is incorporated.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Stabilizing selection of protein function and distribution of selection coefficient among sites.

Authors:  Xun Gu
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Compensatory nearly neutral mutations: selection without adaptation.

Authors:  D L Hartl; C H Taubes
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1996-10-07       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Compensating for our load of mutations: freezing the meltdown of small populations.

Authors:  A Poon; S P Otto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites.

Authors:  X Gu; Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  15 in total

1.  From adaptation to molecular evolution.

Authors:  L-M Chevin; A P Beckerman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The nearly neutral and selection theories of molecular evolution under the fisher geometrical framework: substitution rate, population size, and complexity.

Authors:  Pablo Razeto-Barry; Javier Díaz; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Molecular evolution, mutation size and gene pleiotropy: a geometric reexamination.

Authors:  Pablo Razeto-Barry; Javier Díaz; Darko Cotoras; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Divergence and polymorphism under the nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution.

Authors:  John J Welch; Adam Eyre-Walker; David Waxman
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  The pleiotropic structure of the genotype-phenotype map: the evolvability of complex organisms.

Authors:  Günter P Wagner; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Pleiotropy can be effectively estimated without counting phenotypes through the rank of a genotype-phenotype map.

Authors:  Xun Gu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genome factor and gene pleiotropy hypotheses in protein evolution.

Authors:  Yanwu Zeng; Xun Gu
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Differences in duplication age distributions between human GPCRs and their downstream genes from a network prospective.

Authors:  Yong Huang; Ying Zheng; Zhixi Su; Xun Gu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Organ evolution in angiosperms driven by correlated divergences of gene sequences and expression patterns.

Authors:  Ruolin Yang; Xiangfeng Wang
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  The Utility of Fisher's Geometric Model in Evolutionary Genetics.

Authors:  O Tenaillon
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 13.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.