Literature DB >> 14597293

How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing.

Peter Hagoort1.   

Abstract

Syntax is one of the components in the architecture of language processing that allows the listener/reader to bind single-word information into a unified interpretation of multiword utterances. This paper discusses ERP effects that have been observed in relation to syntactic processing. The fact that these effects differ from the semantic N400 indicates that the brain honors the distinction between semantic and syntactic binding operations. Two models of syntactic processing attempt to account for syntax-related ERP effects. One type of model is serial, with a first phase that is purely syntactic in nature (syntax-first model). The other type of model is parallel and assumes that information immediately guides the interpretation process once it becomes available. This is referred to as the immediacy model. ERP evidence is presented in support of the latter model. Next, an explicit computational model is proposed to explain the ERP data. This Unification Model assumes that syntactic frames are stored in memory and retrieved on the basis of the spoken or written word form input. The syntactic frames associated with the individual lexical items are unified by a dynamic binding process into a structural representation that spans the whole utterance. On the basis of a meta-analysis of imaging studies on syntax, it is argued that the left posterior inferior frontal cortex is involved in binding syntactic frames together, whereas the left superior temporal cortex is involved in retrieval of the syntactic frames stored in memory. Lesion data that support the involvement of this left frontotemporal network in syntactic processing are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597293     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  63 in total

1.  Neural correlates of covert and overt production of tense and agreement morphology: Evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  Aneta Kielar; Lisa Milman; Borna Bonakdarpour; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German.

Authors:  Jörg Bahlmann; Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells; Michael Rotte; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Borna Bonakdarpour; Stephen C Fix; Henrike K Blumenfeld; Todd B Parrish; Darren R Gitelman; M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Beyond the sentence given.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort; Jos van Berkum
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Towards dynamical system models of language-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Peter Beim Graben; Sabrina Gerth; Shravan Vasishth
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Prolegomena to a neurocomputational architecture for human grammatical encoding and decoding.

Authors:  Gerard Kempen
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2014-01

7.  Unifying syntactic theory and sentence processing difficulty through a connectionist minimalist parser.

Authors:  Sabrina Gerth; Peter Beim Graben
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences.

Authors:  Christophe Pallier; Anne-Dominique Devauchelle; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca's aphasia to produce fluent speech.

Authors:  Julius Fridriksson; H Isabel Hubbard; Sarah Grace Hudspeth; Audrey L Holland; Leonardo Bonilha; Davida Fromm; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Electrophysiological evidence for the interaction of prosody and thematic fit during sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Katherine J Midgley; Tracy Love; Lewis P Shapiro; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.