Literature DB >> 12522709

Anterior fixation in the osteoporotic spine: cut-out and pullout characteristics of implants.

Stephen J Ferguson1, Florian Winkler, Lutz-P Nolte.   

Abstract

A new concept for the anchorage of anterior fixation implants in the osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar spine is presented. The SpiralBlade has been proposed as a suitable device for use in the osteoporotic spine, due to its broad, flat surface, which should provide resistance against cut-out of the implant through the vertebral body under dynamic loading. The cut-out and pullout characteristics of this implant were tested. The SpiralBlade was tested with and without a supplementary insertion guide screw. Two other commercial implants were tested for comparison: the VentroFix and the MACS-TL HMA (hollow monoaxial) screw. All implants were tested in osteoporotic human cadaveric vertebrae, using a modified in vitro testing protocol which simulated a full corpectomy model. Dynamic cyclic loading of 100 N, 200 N and 400 N was applied to the implant for 1000 cycles at each load level, and the subsidence of the vertebral body relative to the implant was measured. Following cyclic testing, the pullout strength of the implant was measured. No significant differences were found in the cut-out performance between the SpiralBlade with guide screw and the VentroFix. The SpiralBlade inserted without a guide screw was prone to cutting-out and a substantial loss of angular alignment of the vertebral body. Cut-out of the HMA screw was significantly greater than with the other implants. Two HMA screws fractured during testing. The VentroFix, with an average pullout force of 1166 N, has a significantly higher resistance to pullout than the SpiralBlade with guide screw (417 N), the SpiralBlade (332 N) and the Aesculap HMA screw (298 N). The SpiralBlade may be an alternative to anterior screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine, offering the same cut-out resistance with one implant rather than two screws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12522709     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0449-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  11 in total

1.  Limited access surgery for 360 degrees in-situ fusion in a dysraphic patient with high-grade spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  M A König; B M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume.

Authors:  Meena M Sran; Karim M Khan; Kathy Keiver; Jason B Chew; Heather A McKay; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies.

Authors:  Konrad Seller; Dieter Wahl; Alexander Wild; Rüdiger Krauspe; Erich Schneider; Berend Linke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Revision strategy and follow-up for implant failure in a case of combined anterior and posterior reconstruction after three-level en bloc vertebral body replacement and replacement of the aorta for chondrosarcoma of the thoracic spine.

Authors:  T Graulich; C Krettek; C W Müller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Strategies of spinal fusion on osteoporotic spine.

Authors:  Sung Bae Park; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-06-30

6.  Symphyseal internal rod fixation versus standard plate fixation for open book pelvic ring injuries: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  G Osterhoff; S Tiziani; C Hafner; S J Ferguson; H-P Simmen; C M L Werner
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Vertebroplasty with self-locking hexagonal metal implants shows comparable primary and secondary stiffness to PMMA cement augmentation techniques in a biomechanical vertebral compression fracture model.

Authors:  W Schmoelz; A C Disch; J F Huber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The impact of menopause on bone fusion after the single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Sung Bae Park; Chun Kee Chung; Sang Hyung Lee; Hee-Jin Yang; Young-Je Son; Young Seob Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-12-31

9.  Cement Augmentation in Sacroiliac Screw Fixation Offers Modest Biomechanical Advantages in a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Georg Osterhoff; Andrew E Dodd; Florence Unno; Angus Wong; Shahram Amiri; Kelly A Lefaivre; Pierre Guy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  [Biomechanical aspects of complex reconstructions following radical resection of thoracolumbar spinal tumors].

Authors:  A C Disch; M Pumberger; W Schmoelz; I Melcher; C Druschel; K-D Schaser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.